Religion?
Forums › General Discussion › Religion?-
Ojibwe wrote:
I think you a word there.rojo2017 wrote:
My point is that I refuse take seriously someone's opinion if they can't even spell that opinion.Ojibwe wrote:
your pointMost presidential candidates can spell too.
-
I am sending you to the Er B
-
What exactly are you going to debate?
-
Ojibwe wrote:
That sounds stuburn to me.rojo2017 wrote:
My point is that I refuse take seriously someone's opinion if they can't even spell that opinion.Ojibwe wrote:
your pointMost presidential candidates can spell too.
-
rojo2017 wrote:
Stubborn*Ojibwe wrote:
That sounds stuburn to me.rojo2017 wrote:
My point is that I refuse take seriously someone's opinion if they can't even spell that opinion.Ojibwe wrote:
your pointMost presidential candidates can spell too.
-
I hate how the Don protects them.
-
Carpenter wrote:
I had read that ten times to find my missing word. :)Ojibwe wrote:
I think you a word there.rojo2017 wrote:
My point is that I refuse take seriously someone's opinion if they can't even spell that opinion.Ojibwe wrote:
your pointMost presidential candidates can spell too.
-
Instead of banning the debate, they should ban the people who are incapable of discussing an idea, but who make insulting personal attacks on the person with opposing views, rather than the topic.
-
BakedBananas wrote:
This^Instead of banning the debate, they should ban the people who are incapable of discussing an idea, but who make insulting personal attacks on the person with opposing views, rather than the topic.
-
👿Belial wrote:
BakedBananas wrote:
This^Instead of banning the debate, they should ban the people who are incapable of discussing an idea, but who make insulting personal attacks on the person with opposing views, rather than the topic.
yea, that sound like a good idea. i just saw an evolution thread go down, so I guess that wont be happening any time soon...
-
Chortles wrote:
I made the evolution thread and took it down because it was turning into a religious debate👿Belial wrote:
BakedBananas wrote:
This^Instead of banning the debate, they should ban the people who are incapable of discussing an idea, but who make insulting personal attacks on the person with opposing views, rather than the topic.
yea, that sound like a good idea. i just saw an evolution thread go down, so I guess that wont be happening any time soon...
-
Not going there again. Ill talk via pm, I really didn't like the messages a got last time. :)
-
rojo2017 wrote:
Chortles wrote:
I made the evolution thread and took it down because it was turning into a religious debate👿Belial wrote:
BakedBananas wrote:
This^Instead of banning the debate, they should ban the people who are incapable of discussing an idea, but who make insulting personal attacks on the person with opposing views, rather than the topic.
yea, that sound like a good idea. i just saw an evolution thread go down, so I guess that wont be happening any time soon...
isn't that normally part of the debate or where you looking punctuated equilibrium vs. phyletic gradualism?
-
rojo2017 wrote:
Evolution is a belief, that's why the thread changedChortles wrote:
I made the evolution thread and took it down because it was turning into a religious debate👿Belial wrote:
BakedBananas wrote:
This^Instead of banning the debate, they should ban the people who are incapable of discussing an idea, but who make insulting personal attacks on the person with opposing views, rather than the topic.
yea, that sound like a good idea. i just saw an evolution thread go down, so I guess that wont be happening any time soon...
-
glman wrote:
I was meaning for the thread to only be about evolution with some religion in it, it turned into religion with some evolutionrojo2017 wrote:
Evolution is a belief, that's why the thread changedChortles wrote:
I made the evolution thread and took it down because it was turning into a religious debate👿Belial wrote:
BakedBananas wrote:
This^Instead of banning the debate, they should ban the people who are incapable of discussing an idea, but who make insulting personal attacks on the person with opposing views, rather than the topic.
yea, that sound like a good idea. i just saw an evolution thread go down, so I guess that wont be happening any time soon...
-
Religious debates would be okay if people brought intelligent arguments to the table, but you always have the people that say "I'm right and you are wrong" regardless of what anybody says. They are too blinded by what they believe to even consider other peoples beliefs.
-
~B~, who were you before you reset?
-
UnknownAssassin wrote:
B is me.~B~, who were you before you reset?
-
👿Belial wrote:
No. I am you. I'm the primary. Belial is the muleUnknownAssassin wrote:
B is me.~B~, who were you before you reset?
-
GENESIS?!?!
GENESIS IS TOPIC FORBIDDEN!!
-
BakedBananas wrote:
No, because some people are morons, and it's important to point that out, lest they continue to embarrass themselves in public.Instead of banning the debate, they should ban the people who are incapable of discussing an idea, but who make insulting personal attacks on the person with opposing views, rather than the topic.
-
Brown🎵Note😲 wrote:
Damn you and your good points, Brown! 😡BakedBananas wrote:
No, because some people are morons, and it's important to point that out, lest they continue to embarrass themselves in public.Instead of banning the debate, they should ban the people who are incapable of discussing an idea, but who make insulting personal attacks on the person with opposing views, rather than the topic.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC