At this exact moment in time...
Forums › General Discussion › At this exact moment in time...-
Rik1 wrote:
There's threads about why not to cap inactives. Or it's on the wiki. And there's definitely a thread listing code websites. I'll go bump it right now.Ꮹཞ།ཀཀ wrote:While this is a good point, they can read. No need for posting. The answer to 99% of questions they could have is either in the help forum, or under the help tab on the main screen. Or they could pm other players.
As a new player who took the time to read the entire help section, nowhere did I find anything in there telling me not to cap innactives, not to raise a vendetta just because someone taxed 2 of my turfs, or where to find a website listing codes to punch. All of that information however was found on my first visit to the forum. The OP suggests no access whatsoever until level 15 but by then the damage has been done. The game (and it's forums) are for everyone not just the elite. We are happy enough ✂.
-
👉🔥ɧʘω🔥👈 wrote:
I made a suggestion before about a voting to reward helpfuls, all the things that could go wrong with that can be applied to voting out.What about a way to vote people out of the fourms. If the person was voted out, of the fourms then they would get a day ban.if they where voted out again, Then they would get a week ban, then a month ban.
-
Or just new fourms. Some for noobs talking about, candy and girls and egg nog and whatnot and one for player that have been in this game for like 2 to 4 months to keep all the younglings out.
-
👉🔥ɧʘω🔥👈 wrote:
You must be referring to rojo2017 I totally agreeWhat about a way to vote people out of the fourms. If the person was voted out, of the fourms then they would get a day ban.if they where voted out again, Then they would get a week ban, then a month ban.
-
👉🔥ɧʘω🔥👈 wrote:
What about people using more then 1 account?What about a way to vote people out of the fourms. If the person was voted out, of the fourms then they would get a day ban.if they where voted out again, Then they would get a week ban, then a month ban.
-
Dmitri wrote:
Your concern here is that a swaggeresque character with enough accounts can multi vote and get anyone baned??👉🔥ɧʘω🔥👈 wrote:
What about people using more then 1 account?What about a way to vote people out of the fourms. If the person was voted out, of the fourms then they would get a day ban.if they where voted out again, Then they would get a week ban, then a month ban.
-
Hyena wrote:
Something like that.Dmitri wrote:
Your concern here is that a swaggeresque character with enough accounts can multi vote and get anyone baned??👉🔥ɧʘω🔥👈 wrote:
What about people using more then 1 account?What about a way to vote people out of the fourms. If the person was voted out, of the fourms then they would get a day ban.if they where voted out again, Then they would get a week ban, then a month ban.
-
Chuck иorris wrote:
That's not such a bad idea and something along these lines would make a good compromise.Or just new fourms. Some for noobs talking about, candy and girls and egg nog and whatnot and one for player that have been in this game for like 2 to 4 months to keep all the younglings out.
After that length of time they should be savvy enough to post in the main forum. -
Ꮹཞ།ཀཀ wrote: There's threads about why not to cap inactives. Or it's on the wiki. And there's definitely a thread listing code websites. I'll go bump it right now.
That's kind of the point I was making. The OP was suggesting no access whatsoever until level 15 but they need at least SOME access to be able to read the very helpful threads that you mention. -
Banning the word debate is a bit harsh. Debates are what forums are for.
-
👉🔥ɧʘω🔥👈 wrote:
You do realize that you're one of the worst and would for sure be banned forever right?What about a way to vote people out of the fourms. If the person was voted out, of the fourms then they would get a day ban.if they where voted out again, Then they would get a week ban, then a month ban.
-
👿Belial wrote:
👍👉🔥ɧʘω🔥👈 wrote:
You do realize that you're one of the worst and would for sure be banned forever right?What about a way to vote people out of the fourms. If the person was voted out, of the fourms then they would get a day ban.if they where voted out again, Then they would get a week ban, then a month ban.
-
Rules to be stickied: no. An example is in the Vendetta forum...nobody follows the rules that mystery states needs to be done when posting a vendetta post
-
YES
-
Actually I would have to say the forums were worse a couple months ago, there were trolls everywhere until nr big cat came along.
-
Rik1 wrote:
Yeah I'm with you there. I don't think they shouldn't have access. Just a restriction on posting for a bit. Maybe only be able to post in the help forum or something.Ꮹཞ།ཀཀ wrote: There's threads about why not to cap inactives. Or it's on the wiki. And there's definitely a thread listing code websites. I'll go bump it right now.
That's kind of the point I was making. The OP was suggesting no access whatsoever until level 15 but they need at least SOME access to be able to read the very helpful threads that you mention. -
That would be awesome. Unfortunately we know it will never happen. If we want to solve this problem we will have to do it ourselves. Forum strike. TW strike. Super war, causing players everywhere to start dropping the game. Until our demands are met. We could create a board to organize rebellions using pal. Hope I don't get a ban for mutiny for some of these suggestions, but I have even more suggestions that would surly get a ban.
-
mr71vwbus wrote:
I think he's getting better! 😃👿Belial wrote:
👍👉🔥ɧʘω🔥👈 wrote:
You do realize that you're one of the worst and would for sure be banned forever right?What about a way to vote people out of the fourms. If the person was voted out, of the fourms then they would get a day ban.if they where voted out again, Then they would get a week ban, then a month ban.
-
Don't know why the vets think they are way more interesting than the noobs? I've been reading the forum for about 18 months and I don't find it that much different. There have always been gems, and there has always been garbage. If you don't care for the subject line, then don't read it. I personally find the debates more interesting than numerous posts stating that X mobster has reached Y mob, or arguments about fights on the other side of the world or country. I like the witty threads, and often they are born out of mundane threads. It would get very boring indeed if you restricted new blood from contributing.
-
BakedBananas wrote:
What about people that just troll absolute garbage? Like super troll or whatever, and others like him? Just let them crap on the forums?Don't know why the vets think they are way more interesting than the noobs? I've been reading the forum for about 18 months and I don't find it that much different. There have always been gems, and there has always been garbage. If you don't care for the subject line, then don't read it. I personally find the debates more interesting than numerous posts stating that X mobster has reached Y mob, or arguments about fights on the other side of the world or country. I like the witty threads, and often they are born out of mundane threads. It would get very boring indeed if you restricted new blood from contributing.
-
God damn the best idea I've ever heard here. +infinite
-
There should be no censorship. Who is anyone to decide what makes good content?
-
ZRAYGO wrote:
There should be no censorship. Who is anyone to decide what makes good content?
-
ZRAYGO wrote:
There should be no censorship. Who is anyone to decide what makes good content?
-
Yes except let view the forums straight away so they can learn about the game quicker
-
👉🔥ɧʘω🔥👈 wrote:
Right, let's think about this.What about a way to vote people out of the fourms. If the person was voted out, of the fourms then they would get a day ban.if they where voted out again, Then they would get a week ban, then a month ban.
Well, that's all the large players banned. People won't use it to get rid of spamming or trolling. They'd just vote anyone they hate or disagree with out.
Oh, Havoc capped me the other day... Vote
Ahhh, Grim's opinion conflicts with mine. Vote
Greenman has a vendetta on me. Vote.The votes will evenutally build other as someone else does the same. It'll just turn into whoever has had a minor disagreement will be banned.
And the names are random names I thought of. You should feel honoured!
-
"What about people that just troll absolute garbage? Like super troll or whatever, and others like him? Just let them crap on the forums?"
IGNORE THEM. You can see his name in the title. Don't respond to them, they are looking for attention, so don't give it to them, they will get bored soon enough and move to another forum in another game. If they get offensive rather than irritating, the moderators will ban them. -
BakedBananas wrote:
Don't know why the vets think they are way more interesting than the noobs? I've been reading the forum for about 18 months and I don't find it that much different. There have always been gems, and there has always been garbage. If you don't care for the subject line, then don't read it. I personally find the debates more interesting than numerous posts stating that X mobster has reached Y mob, or arguments about fights on the other side of the world or country. I like the witty threads, and often they are born out of mundane threads. It would get very boring indeed if you restricted new blood from contributing.
ZRAYGO wrote:
There should be no censorship. Who is anyone to decide what makes good content?
☝😏
😄 If you don't like it Ignore it 🌹
-
ZRAYGO wrote:
There should be no censorship. Who is anyone to decide what makes good content?
-
What if they allowed lower levels to read all of the forums and not comment until... 30/40? But there would be a separate forum for people with lower levels where they could ask for help?
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC