Low Mob Exploit?

Forums › General Discussion › Low Mob Exploit?

Whitewater Mar 11, 2012

Could someone please explain what it is? Is it referring to being level 5 with 10k mob?
🔰Superyan🔰 Mar 11, 2012

Low mob tactic***
👿Belial Mar 11, 2012

No. Capture range is based on mob. The smaller the mon the closer an enemy has to be to capture you. So if you drop to a small enough mob you can't be captured. Then you just v up and take everything from them :)
♆𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐄𝐈𝐃𝐎𝐍♆ Mar 11, 2012

DRAMABOT 5000 wrote:
No. Capture range is based on mob. The smaller the mon the closer an enemy has to be to capture you. So if you drop to a small enough mob you can't be captured. Then you just v up and take everything from them :)

Is it based on the inf of the turf too?
👿Belial Mar 11, 2012

Mr Bloody Doom wrote:
DRAMABOT 5000 wrote:
No. Capture range is based on mob. The smaller the mon the closer an enemy has to be to capture you. So if you drop to a small enough mob you can't be captured. Then you just v up and take everything from them :)

Is it based on the inf of the turf too?
Influence of an individual turf can have a small impact yeah. But mob has even more
♆𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐄𝐈𝐃𝐎𝐍♆ Mar 11, 2012

DRAMABOT 5000 wrote:
Mr Bloody Doom wrote:
DRAMABOT 5000 wrote:
No. Capture range is based on mob. The smaller the mon the closer an enemy has to be to capture you. So if you drop to a small enough mob you can't be captured. Then you just v up and take everything from them :)

Is it based on the inf of the turf too?
Influence of an individual turf can have a small impact yeah. But mob has even more
Ok it's why they were all 1 inf...
~REVENGE~ Mar 11, 2012

DRAMABOT 5000 wrote:
No. Capture range is based on mob. The smaller the mon the closer an enemy has to be to capture you. So if you drop to a small enough mob you can't be captured. Then you just v up and take everything from them :)

Are they capturing turf in the V or just leveling it? I didn't think you could actually cap turf in a V.
TheNewfieBullet Mar 11, 2012

IMO it is actually a pretty good strategy. Course it really is exploiting, so you probably shouldn't be at it. It's intelligent though.....
🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 Mar 11, 2012

Two
🔰Superyan🔰 Mar 11, 2012

TheNewfieBullet wrote:
IMO it is actually a pretty good strategy. Course it really is exploiting, so you probably shouldn't be at it. It's intelligent though.....

Tactic*
TheNewfieBullet Mar 11, 2012

Superyan wrote:
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
IMO it is actually a pretty good strategy. Course it really is exploiting, so you probably shouldn't be at it. It's intelligent though.....

Tactic*
Hmmm? What do you mean?
🔰Superyan🔰 Mar 11, 2012

TheNewfieBullet wrote:
Superyan wrote:
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
IMO it is actually a pretty good strategy. Course it really is exploiting, so you probably shouldn't be at it. It's intelligent though.....

Tactic*
Hmmm? What do you mean?
You guys keep spelling tactic wrong.
It's spelt TACTIC not EXPLOIT.
Silly people.
TheNewfieBullet Mar 11, 2012

Superyan wrote:
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
Superyan wrote:
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
IMO it is actually a pretty good strategy. Course it really is exploiting, so you probably shouldn't be at it. It's intelligent though.....

Tactic*
Hmmm? What do you mean?
You guys keep spelling tactic wrong.
It's spelt TACTIC not EXPLOIT.
Silly people.
It is a tactic. Course, I guess you shoulda said tacticing instead of exploiting... Which doesn't make alot of sense...
🔰Superyan🔰 Mar 11, 2012

TheNewfieBullet wrote:
Superyan wrote:
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
Superyan wrote:
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
IMO it is actually a pretty good strategy. Course it really is exploiting, so you probably shouldn't be at it. It's intelligent though.....

Tactic*
Hmmm? What do you mean?
You guys keep spelling tactic wrong.
It's spelt TACTIC not EXPLOIT.
Silly people.
It is a tactic. Course, I guess you shoulda said tacticing instead of exploiting... Which doesn't make alot of sense...
Everything makes sense in my world.
dark flame🔥 Mar 11, 2012

One
М།ИᎠФVཇЯМДᎢᎢཇЯ Mar 11, 2012

Superyan wrote:
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
Superyan wrote:
TheNewfieBullet wrote:
IMO it is actually a pretty good strategy. Course it really is exploiting, so you probably shouldn't be at it. It's intelligent though.....

Tactic*
Hmmm? What do you mean?
You guys keep spelling tactic wrong.
It's spelt TACTIC not EXPLOIT.
Silly people.
That sentence doesn't make since if you put tactic there silly people