⚠ Tokyo airport pest control work ⚠
Forums › General Discussion › ⚠ Tokyo airport pest control work ⚠-
randombloke wrote:
Agreed🔥Jøhnny⌖Cage🔥 wrote:
Not taking anything away from smash and V as they're both good players, but there is OBVIOUSLY something wrong with the game mechanics if 2 players with less than 50 mob between them can take over an airport. If a top mobster did that you could snipe them from mars. You can't cap these two unless they target you in their vendetta, and only if... Please fix this ridiculous situation nick.YOU wrote:
Vadan 15 mob: 75 apt turf, smasher 5 mob: 121 apt turf....Wheres Random, I thought he'd be here protesting your use of low mobs in this way.... How to blockade an airport 101: use 2 accounts both with 15 or less mob and completely fill the airport... What a bunch of hypocrites!!! TWFC your fighting a lonely war all by yourself, look around you...
-
V are good players and badass ones at that. But as randombloke said there has to be something wrong when 2 players with less than 100 mob can over runn everything and cant be capped. There has to be some initial range. Or some implemented rule to balence this.
-
It's all tactics. Got to use whatever advantage you can find within the TW rules. Isn't that part of the game?
-
The game balance has gone askew when micro mobs can hold an airport between them. The problem is down to extreme examples of small mobs/large turf count and a silly rule that makes 1 inf turf untouchable for a small mobster - there should be a "normal" minimum cap range, no matter the mob size or turf influence.
-
Fluke wrote:
to prevent bigger players from abusing this, nick should make it so after a certain number of turf, the micro mob then has the "normal" cap rangeThe game balance has gone askew when micro mobs can hold an airport between them. The problem is down to extreme examples of small mobs/large turf count and a silly rule that makes 1 inf turf untouchable for a small mobster - there should be a "normal" minimum cap range, no matter the mob size or turf influence.
-
yomama1064 wrote:
If only it were so simple....Fluke wrote:
to prevent bigger players from abusing this, nick should make it so after a certain number of turf, the micro mob then has the "normal" cap rangeThe game balance has gone askew when micro mobs can hold an airport between them. The problem is down to extreme examples of small mobs/large turf count and a silly rule that makes 1 inf turf untouchable for a small mobster - there should be a "normal" minimum cap range, no matter the mob size or turf influence.
-
Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
Are you serious? Untouchable? I thought you knew some strategy.The problem addi is that, even though we all have these micro mobs, 1 party in particular feels the need to lie about using these players themselves. Take Beijing as a perfect example, we had no choice but to bring smaller players in after havoc and bugs spammed a few 100 turf and the micro mobs spread. Without our micro mobs these 2 would be untouchable, imo that's just as bad as 2 micro mobs taking over an airport.
However, I've taken advantage of a perfectly legitimate strategy given my situation. Someone accusing me of doing wrong is just as bad as everyone using micro mob mules.
It's always a 2-way strategy, some community members are just to naive to understand that until they step in to a frontline themselves.
-
Fluke wrote:
Absolutely spot on. I don't care if we have to be sitting on top of them as annoying as that may be. Better than truly invincible.The game balance has gone askew when micro mobs can hold an airport between them. The problem is down to extreme examples of small mobs/large turf count and a silly rule that makes 1 inf turf untouchable for a small mobster - there should be a "normal" minimum cap range, no matter the mob size or turf influence.
-
Λdོdོi wrote:
Agreed. Good call Fluke. 👍.Fluke wrote:
Absolutely spot on. I don't care if we have to be sitting on top of them as annoying as that may be. Better than truly invincible.The game balance has gone askew when micro mobs can hold an airport between them. The problem is down to extreme examples of small mobs/large turf count and a silly rule that makes 1 inf turf untouchable for a small mobster - there should be a "normal" minimum cap range, no matter the mob size or turf influence.
-
🔥Jøhnny⌖Cage🔥 wrote:
Actually, Vadan targets me and I had a turf right on top of him, but still couldn't cap due to influence rule. So...back to drop inf tactics to fight it for the 15 min they might be in a V? Right.randombloke wrote:
Agreed🔥Jøhnny⌖Cage🔥 wrote:
Not taking anything away from smash and V as they're both good players, but there is OBVIOUSLY something wrong with the game mechanics if 2 players with less than 50 mob between them can take over an airport. If a top mobster did that you could snipe them from mars. You can't cap these two unless they target you in their vendetta, and only if... Please fix this ridiculous situation nick.YOU wrote:
Vadan 15 mob: 75 apt turf, smasher 5 mob: 121 apt turf....Wheres Random...edit 4 length...
-
YOU wrote:
And at my current mob, I'd only have reached a single turf in all likelihood.🔥Jøhnny⌖Cage🔥 wrote:
Actually, Vadan targets me and I had a turf right on top of him, but still couldn't cap due to influence rule. So...back to drop inf tactics to fight it for the 15 min they might be in a V? Right.randombloke wrote:
Agreed🔥Jøhnny⌖Cage🔥 wrote:
Not taking anything away...but there is OBVIOUSLY something wrong with the game mechanics if 2 players with less than 50 mob between them can take over an airport. If a top mobster did that you could snipe them from mars. You can't cap these two unless they target you in their vendetta, and only if... Please fix this ridiculous situation nick.YOU wrote:
-
It's an interesting situation and certainly highlights where the game is broken.
Agree with Fluke and the others above suggesting tweaks on cap distance where needed.
Good thread for shining a brighter light on the problem.
-
As for the level/inf issue, my opinion is if a guy is in a v, then he's played long enough to at least be capped by his targets.
-
Kinky Friedman wrote:
Agreed.As for the level/inf issue, my opinion is if a guy is in a v, then he's played long enough to at least be capped by his targets.
-
Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
Stfu Vadan, I've been here just as long as you have and I am sure many more people like me than an exploiter, I don't care what you say about strategy, once the devs do something about that you're fucked. So why don't you go spam some more turf.And some community members are just simple stupid, like zingg above, who knows nothing of players or the game but tries to make me look like I'm doing wrong lol.
And then you have the JC type, who's well informed and respected, but completely oblivious to the game in hand.
-
Zingg did you reset?
-
Ʈℍㅌ ʘㄕㅌℝ₳₮ミℝ wrote:
I think so. He was Joe Zingg before this right?Zingg did you reset?
-
Dayum
-
Reaper💀 wrote:
Fuck. I agree with you for once!It's all tactics. Got to use whatever advantage you can find within the TW rules. Isn't that part of the game?
-
Λdོdོi wrote:
Ho can anyone get range on 40-50k mobs when they're surrounded by micro mobs? Using micro mobs that's how. Or spamming a few 100 too, enough to let them hit limit n still remain. But then u hit stalemate.Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
Are you serious? Untouchable? I thought you knew some strategy....Take Beijing as a perfect example, we had no choice but to bring smaller players in after havoc and bugs spammed a few 100 turf and the micro mobs spread. Without our micro mobs these 2 would be untouchable, imo that's just as bad as 2 micro mobs taking over an airport.
However, I've taken advantage of a perfectly legitimate strategy given my situation. Someone accusing me of doing wrong is just as bad as everyone using micro mob mules.
It's always a 2-way strategy, some community members are just to naive to understand that until they step in to a frontline themselves.
-
🍀Add ZINGG🍀 wrote:
I've been here close to 2 years. Irrelevant. I can guarantee I've seen, known n done more in a week than u have since ur time here. There's no need to talk shit in a topic of no concern to you and a subject you have no knowledge of.Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
Stfu Vadan, I've been here just as long as you have and I am sure many more people like me than an exploiter, I don't care what you say about strategy, once the devs do something about that you're fucked. So why don't you go spam some more turf.And some community members are just simple stupid, like zingg above, who knows nothing of players or the game but tries to make me look like I'm doing wrong lol.
Stop showing yourself up and acting like a silly little noob and someone may 1 day take you seriously. Fuckin mug jog on.
-
Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
I don't actually disagree with this in theory. But in practice most of us started under one system and suddenly under a new system an entirely different style of gameplay is what's required. In all honesty, I'm stuck. I worked hard for my mob. If I delete it, I bet you anything this "exploit" gets sorted and I'd be up a creek with no mob. If I continue to punch (which I stopped doing mostly because there seem to be so few benefits to it anymore) I honestly don't see a way to combat the micro mob situation unless I encourage other micro mob players. Is it fair...difficult question. I think it's fair for Vadan to play this way because that's how the game is set up. Is it fair for the game to have been changed to allow this? No. It is not. So I won't encourage it. But I'll suffer for not encouraging the practice.Reaper💀 wrote:
-
Contrary to my current circumstantial actions, I wholly agree with the majority on both sides. For a long time now have mules been used as micro mob snipers and I've personally been on the receiving end and know how frustrating it is. Also having thoroughly used this strategy now, I see how incredibly powerful it is.
I think the fair solution to this would be to make any size mob, within your influence range, capable when they join a V. It shouldn't be just for the targets, it should be for all. This way micro mobs still have an advantage but actions face consequence, like everyone else.
And is the last time I'll say this. I'm not a damn mule, I know what I'm doing and I'm certainly not "exploiting". I'm doing exactly what reaper said. Nick also needs to learn to take note of people accusing others of exploition which is according to Nicks TOS, a damn violation.
-
I use "exploit" only because it was commonly used in the thread. IMO, if the game mechanics allow for it and the TOS are not being violated, then more power to ya--in fact, the game ought to be played like that almost...it's not the player's issue. It's a dev issue.
-
⌖🔥💋Ultra💋🔥⌖ wrote:
Agreed. I would actually go as far as saying, if someone deliberately deletes mob to take advantage of this strategy, they are exploiting. I've done no such thing. This is why it frustrates me when noobs run their mouths off and havocs spams a 100 turf shouting "vadan the exploiter", yet it goes unwarned. Nick has full power to change turf names, yet he does nothing to fix the game flaws or stand by his TOS to the fullest extent.I use "exploit" only because it was commonly used in the thread. IMO, if the game mechanics allow for it and the TOS are not being violated, then more power to ya--in fact, the game ought to be played like that almost...it's not the player's issue. It's a dev issue.
I hate to say it, the game is dying.
-
On a lighter note. Our pest control team successfully removed several hazardous virus' from the Tokyo airport vicinity earlier. Tests are being carried out to locate the source destination. Scheduled work will proceed as normal tomorrow.
No animals will be knowingly harmed during our testing.
Thank you.
-
Oh and ultra, I wasn't capping you, I was sharing the love diddums + I wanted you to sing "my humps" to me. 😍
-
Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
Be careful what you ask for. 😘Oh and ultra, I wasn't capping you, I was sharing the love diddums + I wanted you to sing "my humps" to me. 😍
-
⌖🔥💋Ultra💋🔥⌖ wrote:
Mind...wondering...again! 😳Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
Be careful what you ask for. 😘Oh and ultra, I wasn't capping you, I was sharing the love diddums + I wanted you to sing "my humps" to me. 😍
-
⌖🔥💋Ultra💋🔥⌖ wrote:
I'm asking for it ☝Vadan™ v2.0 wrote:
Be careful what you ask for. 😘Oh and ultra, I wasn't capping you, I was sharing the love diddums + I wanted you to sing "my humps" to me. 😍
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC