Rated 12+
Forums › General Discussion › Rated 12+-
I have a simple request. I support everyones right to post their opinions in the forums. That being said I would like to remind the TW community that there are 12 yr olds playing this game. The rating for this game is as follows.....
Rating. Rated 12+ for the following: infrequent/mild profanity or crude humor, infrequent/mild cartoon or fantasy violence and infrequent/mild alcohol, tobacco and drug use reference.
Let's all remember that we carry a personal responsibility for our conduct in these forums and that kids are present. Thanks
-
I agree. However the cartoons in the 70s,80s were much more violent and crude then they are today. I blame Bugs Bunny and Sam for my aggressive and disturbed behavior.
-
Johnny O wrote:
hookers were not in bugs bunny or any of those cartoons❕💢I agree. However the cartoons in the 70s,80s were much more violent and crude then they are today. I blame Bugs Bunny and Sam for my aggressive and disturbed behavior.
-
The girls in Starblazers and Robotech all dressed like hookers.
-
Hanna Barbera and the wold of violence and lightly dressed cartoon women also messed me up.
-
Lol
-
Is this a shot at me nate?
-
Drug and alcohol use by cartoon heroes. Super chicken drank a cocktail to get his powers and underdog took a pill to get his
-
DriZZy I think it's a scatter shot on everyone. We all have are moments LOL
-
I think Nick has a handle on things. If he allows Tek's trashy ass thread then things are kind of open.
-
Biggest drug use in cartoons has to be Scooby Doo. You know they were not playing Words with friends in that van eating Scooby Snacks.
-
No Drizzy. It's not directed at anyone in particular. I've just noticed that the conduct in the forums is a tad bit over the top of late. Starting back with the PSI nonsense.
-
I need sleep....
-
I agree Nate. Well done for speaking up and reminding folks of this.
-
Does everyone realize what 12 yr. olds are doing these days?
-
I know I mean seriously I don't really care people my age cuss all the time and you think i don't know about sex??
-
I will never understand why mild violence is accetable more than mild sexual innuendo in so many parts of the world.
-
My point is only this.....the rating for this "free" game is 12+. Just because some 12 year olds are talking sex and profanity doesn't mean that they ALL are. The innocence of children should be protected whenever possible. If an innocent 12 yr old looked at the description of this game they would not expect the type of language and conduct That is in the forums now. If Nick wants to change the rating to 17+ then fine but I think we would all agree that not many of us would let our 12 year olds play this game.
-
O.k I have a great story then coming you will love it! LOL
-
This is where I disagree. It's ok to talk about stabbing, shooting, organized crime, killing and bombing, but if someone drops an f-bomb someone's innocence is taken away?
-
Are you really that naive to think that this is about an f-bomb??? Come on Putz....your brighter than that. Aren't you??
-
There should be a disclaimer somewhere that says online interactions are not rated by the ESRB...
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
Not sure what you are referring to then. P s I was an exception and not the rule. Then again I am not on the boards that much to see what else is said.Are you really that naive to think that this is about an f-bomb??? Come on Putz....your brighter than that. Aren't you??
-
21st street muscle wrote:
yes they were ever heard of Roger rabbit's wifeJohnny O wrote:
hookers were not in bugs bunny or any of those cartoons❕💢I agree. However the cartoons in the 70s,80s were much more violent and crude then they are today. I blame Bugs Bunny and Sam for my aggressive and disturbed behavior.
-
woth all do respect nate it isnt that bad or nick wouldve stepped in. I think its more important that the forums be kept interesting and intelligent. I agree with matt. just put the disclaimer up and the problem is solved
-
Honestly, i dont think a 12 year old can really play this game
-
In these times, with the Internet, TV & video games being what they are...I think the actual existence of an 'innocent' 12 year old is a myth.
-
I agree that for the most part the forums are fine. Again, note the 12+ rating. Y'all know as well as I do what is in these forum threads. Don't advertise Infrequent/mild use if in fact it is frequent/mature. Nick has a financial stake in this game and will overlook content for cash. That's business unfortunately.
-
Natedogg 👊🔨💀 wrote:
My point is only this.....the rating for this "free" game is 12+. Just because some 12 year olds are talking sex and profanity doesn't mean that they ALL are. The innocence of children should be protected whenever possible. If an innocent 12 yr old looked at the description of this game they would not expect the type of language and conduct That is in the forums now. If Nick wants to change the rating to 17+ then fine but I think we would all agree that not many of us would let our 12 year olds play this game.
you're concerned about the innocence of children hearing bad language yet you say nothing about letting them participate in stabbing, burning, shooting, blowing up stealing someone's home, committing multiple felonies in the missions.
-
Jmacs language is uncalled for, but you give ur kids guidance and advice that they will see and hear bad things in life and u as a parent and them as an individual can choose to continue to participate or excercise ur right to choose to leave
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC