Safe Zones.
Forums › General Discussion › Safe Zones.-
I didn't put this is S&FB as I think that's more of a place for the devs. This is more for general play.
A lot of players have been setting up safe zones/ no cap zones in their cities where everyone can makeore money and new players can get off to a good start.
So why not apply this idea to airports?
Seems like a logical place for a safe zone/ high income area.
For the travellers, claim a turf at every airport you fly through. I doubt anyone will cap the last turf of a player, and airports have the potential to be some of the highest income properties.
-
Malls and lakes aswell.
-
And universities.
-
I like this idea Charlie This way u won't be able to take my turfs when I go to Hawaii in July
-
I do not agree with safe zones of any kind.
-
Mikey B wrote:
agreed. My reason is what if someone just has a touch and no money for don points. That player is stuck in one area mainly and then cNt play the game to it's fullest.I do not agree with safe zones of any kind.
Just my opnion... Don't hate
-
But just to clarify. I do have an area that I will let ppl know that it is safe to come and to be nice but will not state to other players who want to leapfrog and cap that it's a safe zone. So I guess I have a semi ( safe zone)
-
Safe zones help the local capo more than the small players.
-
How so? Noobs are always goingto have to pay police protection. Capos don't. Whether it's a safe zone or not.
At least in a safe zone, boobs won't have to deal with threats from bigger players.
-
What does benney have to do with this?
-
Damn auto correct.
-
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
lolDamn auto correct.
-
Should be a time limit or level limit so campers don't become squatters, cause watchin prey graze on the fresh grass too long will make any predator salivate.
-
IBad IFish wrote:
let's add cities and towns also maybe parks n streets tooMalls and lakes aswell.
-
That's an excellent point, and I agree. I don't see removing anybody though unless it gets too crowded and new players can't find room.
I plan on keeping just enough of a presence to keep income up and protect noobs/cap agressors.
-
And this obviously won't work i every town. Otherwise there would be no turf wars.
That's why I suggested airports and universities. It's definitely something to be done on a limited scale.
-
I think the decision to establish a safe zone in an area is best left up to the local Capos to decide..they are generally the ones with the most influence & power in the area & can enforce safe zone policies.
-
~Matt~ wrote:
I agree with that idea bestI think the decision to establish a safe zone in an area is best left up to the local Capos to decide..they are generally the ones with the most influence & power in the area & can enforce safe zone policies.
-
Good thread as always Charlie. Good to get this all out in the air. First of all. I like the idea of making the airports safezones of sorts. I'm going to see about implementing this into my city. Furthermore I think that safe zones are optional. Obviously I could wipe out a good chunk of turf in my area/areas I occupy. However I do not for 2 reasons. 1. I know most of the players. And 2. They are appreciative of it and in the end it is a win win situation.
-
I like the airports and parks if a safe zone is needed. Theny concerns are gone. If someone lives in one of those areas then why the hell they own a touch or iPhone anyways
-
JmanX wrote:
~Matt~ wrote:
I agree with that idea bestI think the decision to establish a safe zone in an area is best left up to the local Capos to decide..they are generally the ones with the most influence & power in the area & can enforce safe zone policies.
most definitely. That's why I put it in this part of the forum. It should be up to the players in each area. And safe zone or not, at the very least, turf the airports when you travel.
-
So what you are saying is that the capo of a safe zone will always be capo. Doesn't sound fair to me. How does this help out people trying to start and grow in that area? It only helps the capo
-
We're not talking about the entire map. Just one small part of a city.
Take where I am foe example. I am strong enough to enforce a no cap policy at at Honolulu International Airport. But Guess what? I'm not Capo of Honolulu.
I could easily take it if I wanted it as the Capo is only about 25% of my strength. Capo could change hands many times over w/o affecting the no cap zone.
And again, this is strictly a voluntary thing.
-
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
spot on!We're not talking about the entire map. Just one small part of a city.
Take where I am foe example. I am strong enough to enforce a no cap policy at at Honolulu International Airport. But Guess what? I'm not Capo of Honolulu.
I could easily take it if I wanted it as the Capo is only about 25% of my strength. Capo could change hands many times over w/o affecting the no cap zone.
And again, this is strictly a voluntary thing.
-
ChainsawCharlie wrote:
I guess I dont have an issue with this. But I know for fact that other people use these type of safe zones to justify safe zones in an entire city. Philly for example.We're not talking about the entire map. Just one small part of a city.
Take where I am foe example. I am strong enough to enforce a no cap policy at at Honolulu International Airport. But Guess what? I'm not Capo of Honolulu.
I could easily take it if I wanted it as the Capo is only about 25% of my strength. Capo could change hands many times over w/o affecting the no cap zone.
And again, this is strictly a voluntary thing.
-
Safe zones are pussy, people in this game tend to want to take the capping out because they are all bffs. Without conflict this is just an expencive forums. If everyone wants to be the white night hero thats fine but you have to leave room for assholes or you will have no one to teach a lesson
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC