Need help plz
Forums › Families & Vendettas › Need help plz-
Need help taking down💎DĮÅMøŃD a few notches he took me completely out of Topeka ks just because he had a beef with my daughter babygirl not fair to me considering I only had two turfs there anyway
-
You have 2 accounts baby girl an this one u told me to fck off and capped me 3 times I mobbed up in one night and took u out haters gonna hate.
-
Wow 70ish mob distance between each other. But diamond apparently took the initiative to mob up to get you.
-
They were benefiting each other if u look at trackers turfs they are set up to give baby girl money from the protection. Basically trackers a feeding account to her baby girl one.
-
Better hurry and look she's taking them away as we speak
-
Diamond why are almost every single one of your turf capped?
-
There not tracker11 just mad I mobbed up in a single night and took both her accounts out after she capped 3 of mine!!!! I played fair and let me and her battle like we should...me and her
-
Let the match begin 💎Diamond Vs. Tracker🏁🏁🏁 Go, Go, GOO!!!
-
Sadly it's not against the TOS to use 1 account to pay protection to a second account. Some players, like me, like to hunt players that mule/harvest.
It sounds like Diamond mobbed up & capped 2 turf after having 3 capped. (I haven't looked at their lists to verify). That's the way the game works. Vendettas are also part of the game, but it's not one I'd consider joining, were I looking to join one.
-
I thought it was against TOS to use one account to benifit another?
-
El Chubaneebre wrote:
It's only enforced for things like vendettas.I thought it was against TOS to use one account to benifit another?
-
El Chubaneebre wrote:
Well not exactly, it's illegal to use a second account to gain an unfair advantage in a v if I remember correctly. Correct me if I wrong mystery.😊I thought it was against TOS to use one account to benifit another?
-
TW_Support says:
Thank you for your message.Capping turf is part of the game and is not against the ToS. Happy playing!
Tap "Reply" if you have any further questions or comments.
That was there response when asked 'is it ok to excessively cap another player owned by me or a close friend'
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Not all of them and if he's new he probobly Made the same mistake as I did not knowing who was inactive and who was active or how that even matteredDiamond why are almost every single one of your turf capped?
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Why should that matter? Capping is easier and cheaper than having to build from scratch.Diamond why are almost every single one of your turf capped?
-
El Chubaneebre wrote:
He capped a shitload of noobs, probably some that were inactive. He never gave a chance to the active ones.ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Why should that matter? Capping is easier and cheaper than having to build from scratch.Diamond why are almost every single one of your turf capped?
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
If u were soo sure why'd u back out!???El Chubaneebre wrote:
He capped a shitload of noobs, probably some that were inactive. He never gave a chance to the active ones.ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Why should that matter? Capping is easier and cheaper than having to build from scratch.Diamond why are almost every single one of your turf capped?
-
ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Not that many and the mob sizes look pretty close to his on the most part. Inactive shminactive, as far as I can see the v is because a couple of people are upset they lost a few turf .... not about any inactive caps.El Chubaneebre wrote:
He capped a shitload of noobs, probably some that were inactive. He never gave a chance to the active ones.ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Why should that matter? Capping is easier and cheaper than having to build from scratch.Diamond why are almost every single one of your turf capped?
-
El Chubaneebre wrote:
I'm only fighting for the 65 turf he capped at this point. I feel he was out of line capping that many. I'm not joining a V, but I will fight him.ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Not that many and the mob sizes look pretty close to his on the most part. Inactive shminactive, as far as I can see the v is because a couple of people are upset they lost a few turf .... not about any inactive caps.El Chubaneebre wrote:
He capped a shitload of noobs, probably some that were inactive. He never gave a chance to the active ones.ωⅇɢṡɪⅇṣ wrote:
Why should that matter? Capping is easier and cheaper than having to build from scratch.Diamond why are almost every single one of your turf capped?
-
Ok, be careful i guess. Some of your buffalo grove turf makes interesting reading as well..... The name at the bottom is not nesisarily who it was capped from.
-
El Chubaneebre wrote:
My buffalo grove turf were all capped off of small players by university oil, so I capped almost all of those off of him when the noobs asked me for help. University oil then lied to me about why he capped them. I can openly admit to capping those all off of one person, but it was for a purpose, not just to cap.Ok, be careful i guess. Some of your buffalo grove turf makes interesting reading as well..... The name at the bottom is not nesisarily who it was capped from.
-
That only works if I decide to believe you. If I only go off turfs you have capped a shit load of small players.
-
El Chubaneebre wrote:
Are you using this to defend diamond or bash me? Because he never defended himself and said he had a reason to cap. I just pointed out that I didThat only works if I decide to believe you. If I only go off turfs you have capped a shit load of small players.
-
Both. Arguing a point with the v police. The v's have gone anyway. You still going to be attacking him?
-
El Chubaneebre wrote:
Why does that matter? I'm undecided as whether or not I will continue attacking.Both. Arguing a point with the v police. The v's have gone anyway. You still going to be attacking him?
-
Having been involved in ending this V, I can say that Weg is an honorable player and is more than likely being honest about turf that he has capped in defense of smaller players.
-
Lol, your credentials for determining Weg's honourability is the fact you were involved in ending a V.....but you can't even be sure that he is being honest?
I'm not particularly fussed with the type of player he is, just his reasoning for his actions. The players he attacks are easy for him to beat and he can feel justified in attacking/capping them. Cap/attack away but spare me the BS reason.
-
El Chubaneebre wrote:
Weg was also involved in this V on the opposite side of me and showed nothing but respect towards his opponents, which is why I feel I do have credibility in my statements. He in no way gives me the impression that he is a player who preys upon weaker opponents. You are of course entitled to your opinion, but having dealt directly with him, and seeing his type of play, I'm confident that he is not that kind of player.Lol, your credentials for determining Weg's honourability is the fact you were involved in ending a V.....but you can't even be sure that he is being honest?
I'm not particularly fussed with the type of player he is, just his reasoning for his actions. The players he attacks are easy for him to beat and he can feel justified in attacking/capping them. Cap/attack away but spare me the BS reason.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC