Weapons idea!

Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › Weapons idea!

Jєсɦт Oct 2, 2011

Helicopter: 40 att 50 def
Cost:5 million Upkeep: 800k
Limitations for attack: only works on nearby turf that are in range of a selected turf, and you can only use them a limited about of times per day. They increase your attack by 20%. You must atrach it to a turf. *Can only be unattached once every 24hrs* when unattached and not on a turf they function like regular weapons.

Shotgun: 30att 9 def
Cost 400k Upkeep 400

Explosives: loot
You attach it to your turf and if some one caps it it explodes and drains the attacker's health to 0 and stam all upgrades are destroyed.
Gθςτγ Oct 2, 2011

Justin Duran wrote:
Helicopter: 40 att 50 def
Cost:5 million Upkeep: 800k
Limitations for attack: only works on nearby turf that are in range of a selected turf, and you can only use them a limited about of times per day. They increase your attack by 20%. You must atrach it to a turf. *Can only be unattached once every 24hrs* when unattached and not on a turf they function like regular weapons.

Shotgun: 30att 9 def
Cost 400k Upkeep 400

Explosives: loot
You attach it to your turf and if some one caps it it explodes and drains the attacker's health to 0 and stam all upgrades are destroyed.

The only Idea I like in that is explosives
☢PεtεΤhεβrαvε☢ Oct 2, 2011

👻Gθςτγ👻 wrote:
Justin Duran wrote:
Helicopter: 40 att 50 def
Cost:5 million Upkeep: 800k
Limitations for attack: only works on nearby turf that are in range of a selected turf, and you can only use them a limited about of times per day. They increase your attack by 20%. You must atrach it to a turf. *Can only be unattached once every 24hrs* when unattached and not on a turf they function like regular weapons.

Shotgun: 30att 9 def
Cost 400k Upkeep 400

Explosives: loot
You attach it to your turf and if some one caps it it explodes and drains the attacker's health to 0 and stam all upgrades are destroyed.

The only Idea I like in that is explosives
I pretty much like all of them.
👿Belial Oct 2, 2011

Not needed.
wangberg Oct 2, 2011

🔥HELL RAZOR🔥 wrote:
Not needed.

Worthless input.
I like the explosives idea. It would be cool to take the c4 explosives needed to run some missions and change it's function to this idea.
Mystery Oct 2, 2011

The explosives have already been suggested.

We already have sawed-off shotguns. The stats on the suggestion for this one do not make sense.

The helicopter would be a vehicle. We don't have a vehicle class & IMO we don't need one.
👿Belial Oct 2, 2011

wangberg wrote:
🔥HELL RAZOR🔥 wrote:
Not needed.

Worthless input.
I like the explosives idea. It would be cool to take the c4 explosives needed to run some missions and change it's function to this idea.

To say that something isn't needed isn't worthless input. Weapons are more tha pretty pictures to collect. You hbe to consider if their features nd stats are needed and what impact they'll have in the game as a whole. We are already seeing a slow narrowing of attack and defense. Which is probably needed. But the keyword is SLOW
Billy Da' Kid Oct 2, 2011

🔥HELL RAZOR🔥 wrote:
wangberg wrote:
🔥HELL RAZOR🔥 wrote:
Not needed.

Worthless input.
I like the explosives idea. It would be cool to take the c4 explosives needed to run some missions and change it's function to this idea.

To say that something isn't needed isn't worthless input. Weapons are more tha pretty pictures to collect. You hbe to consider if their features nd stats are needed and what impact they'll have in the game as a whole. We are already seeing a slow narrowing of attack and defense. Which is probably needed. But the keyword is SLOW
You have no room to talk about what isnt needed B. You just suggested "houses" a couple hours ago.
👿Belial Oct 2, 2011

Billy Da' Kid wrote:
🔥HELL RAZOR🔥 wrote:
wangberg wrote:
🔥HELL RAZOR🔥 wrote:
Not needed.

Worthless input.
I like the explosives idea. It would be cool to take the c4 explosives needed to run some missions and change it's function to this idea.

To say that something isn't needed isn't worthless input. Weapons are more tha pretty pictures to collect. You hbe to consider if their features nd stats are needed and what impact they'll have in the game as a whole. We are already seeing a slow narrowing of attack and defense. Which is probably needed. But the keyword is SLOW
You have no room to talk about what isnt needed B. You just suggested "houses" a couple hours ago.
Understand when im messing around. And profile pics and the new post is messing around ;)
👿Belial Oct 2, 2011

Although you have to admit being able to marry and reproduce with other players would be funny. Imagine the fight over Bella.
fum Oct 2, 2011

Nick would have to write some code to prevent people with marrying him he'd lose all that money over the 5 second divorces!
✙Baron✙ Oct 2, 2011

🔥HELL RAZOR🔥 wrote:
Although you have to admit being able to marry and reproduce with other players would be funny. Imagine the fight over Bella.

Sounds like turf wars monogamy.
Vadan™ v2.0 Oct 2, 2011

Stats are totally off. Next.
sofresh Oct 2, 2011

You took my helicopter idea! Too bad it sucks...
wangberg Oct 3, 2011

🔥HELL RAZOR🔥 wrote:
wangberg wrote:
🔥HELL RAZOR🔥 wrote:
Not needed.

Worthless input.
I like the explosives idea. It would be cool to take the c4 explosives needed to run some missions and change it's function to this idea.

To say that something isn't needed isn't worthless input. Weapons are more tha pretty pictures to collect. You hbe to consider if their features nd stats are needed and what impact they'll have in the game as a whole. We are already seeing a slow narrowing of attack and defense. Which is probably needed. But the keyword is SLOW
this is useful. Just stating "not needed" is dismissive.