No more airports 🔥✈
Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › No more airports 🔥✈-
Ꮹཞ།ཀཀ wrote:
Funny you think that way, especially based on this topic. If you had bothered to look, I am already at multiple airports. I am not arguing pro airports just because I want to get to airports. I am arguing it because I truly believe that it needs to happen. Especially now that airports are in game and here to stay. No sense in limiting it now and probably not possible for nick to take out the airports entirely."The Man" wrote:
Ha! You should see dagamer01s comments in the "more airports" thread. His sense of entitlement is almost nauseating.Now I'm seeing players whine about having to hop 60 miles to get to an airport.
Nick, you've changed the game to cater to self entitled pussies, hope the RL cash was worth it. 😒
-
dagamer01 wrote:
I know I pointed that out about you being at airports already. Too many airports is in fact ruining the point of a gps based game. People that want more, more, more airports are usually the ones the don't wanna work for it. Like hopping.Ꮹཞ།ཀཀ wrote:
Funny you think that way, especially based on this topic. If you had bothered to look, I am already at multiple airports. I am not arguing pro airports just because I want to get to airports. I am arguing it because I truly believe that it needs to happen ✂"The Man" wrote:
Ha! You should see dagamer01s comments in the "more airports" thread. His sense of entitlement is almost nauseating.Now I'm seeing players whine about having to hop 60 miles to get to an airport.
Nick, you've changed the game to cater to self entitled pussies, hope the RL cash was worth it. 😒
-
Ꮹཞ།ཀཀ wrote: I know I pointed that out about you being at airports already. Too many airports is in fact ruining the point of a gps based game. People that want more, more, more airports are usually the ones the don't wanna work for it. Like hopping.
I am not the usual player. I have worked my fair share. I hopped to JFK airport 4 times already. First three time I was capped out. By generalizing the belief that people that want more and more airports are "usually" ones that do not want to work for it, you are being stereotypical.As for the gps aspect of the game, I'll admit that it is killing the gps aspect of the game to a degree but how does hopping equate to using GPS? You hop using you currently planted turf not your current location. If you are going to argue that airports are killing the gps aspect of the game you should be arguing the same for hopping then.
-
The only way for you to use GPS to expand is by physical travel. Since hopping, like airports, do not involve physical travel, they are both, in effect, "killing the GPS aspect of the game." so allowing one feature to stay and limiting the other doesnt make sense to me. Between hopping and the current airports, i think it'd be safe to assume that a majority of the TW community doesn't not use GPS as their primary method of expansion. With that said, I dont think adding more airports will make much of a difference. In fact, I think it will allow more people to expand. Which will result in more wars (due to capping, etc). Isn't that what should be happening in Turf "Wars" anyway?
-
Except for turf planted from in-game airports, all hopping stems from turf oroginally planted using your physical location. The game wouldn't work without hopping, but it worked just fine without airports.
-
Mystery wrote:
All hopping may stem from a turf that was planted using gps but that is also true for most if not all airport turfs. Most, if not all, people had to hop to an airport to be able to fly. By the same connectio ur making with all hopped turfs originate from a turf that used GPS , so did all airport turfs.Except for turf planted from in-game airports, all hopping stems from turf oroginally planted using your physical location.
It's true that the game could not function without hopping while it can without airports. The fact of th matter is, as someone in another thread said, "the flood gates are opened." the amount of GPsS involvement is minimal from the very start. Adding even more airports won't make any difference to the gps aspect of the game.
-
Yet there's a huge difference between hopping 1,000 miles (for example) & flying 1,000 miles.
The floodgates haven't been opened, nor should they be. There are plenty of airports now. Having some in no way means we should have all of them open.
-
Mystery wrote:
having some airports may not mean we should have them all but it also doesn't mean we should't have them all.There are plenty of airports now. Having some in no way means we should have all of them open.
Look it's clear that there are pros and cons to both sides of the argument. We've been going back and forth on this for quite some time and I am sure it can go on for ever. The argument is never ending. I think at this point it's best to just let Nick decide considering ultimately it's his decision and both aides of the argument have been thoroughly laid out
-
I agree
-
Mystery wrote:
Except for turf planted from in-game airports, all hopping stems from turf oroginally planted using your physical location. The game wouldn't work without hopping, but it worked just fine without airports.
And there was a lot more risk back then, if you got capped out of an area you might never make it back... 😲
-
I'm fine with airports, but hopping 200 miles to get to one? NO THANKS!
-
Sgt Mayday wrote:
You don't WANT to get to an airport you mean.I can't get to an airport anyways...
-
✙Baron✙ wrote:
Let just say I don't want to waste the time and effort if I'm just going to drive there in a week.Sgt Mayday wrote:
You don't WANT to get to an airport you mean.I can't get to an airport anyways...
-
"The Man" wrote:
Yikes! That should have said "originally."Mystery wrote:
Except for turf planted from in-game airports, all hopping stems from turf oroginally planted using your physical location. The game wouldn't work without hopping, but it worked just fine without airports.
And there was a lot more risk back then, if you got capped out of an area you might never make it back... 😲
-
✙Baron✙ wrote:
Sgt Mayday wrote:
You don't WANT to get to an airport you mean.I can't get to an airport anyways...
Nice. ✊
-
You're losing focus of the real issue:
No more airports!!! 🔥🔥
-
"The Man" wrote:
Your advocacy on the issue quite commendable. 😉You're losing focus of the real issue:
No more airports!!! 🔥🔥
I still feel airports are still needed in many places.
🎉🎉WAY MORE AIRPORTS!!!🎉🎉
-
"The Man" wrote:
ThisYou're losing focus of the real issue:
No more airports!!! 🔥🔥
-
YОU wrote:
"The Man" wrote:
ThisYou're losing focus of the real issue:
No more airports!!! 🔥🔥
✊
-
"The Man" wrote:
I'm just curious here. Did you physically fly to all those countries and plant turf? Or have you used in game airports to expand around the world?You're losing focus of the real issue:
No more airports!!! 🔥🔥
To me airports are a big part of the game. I honestly don't know how so many people played without them in the beginning. Yes you could hop the next city over and one or two more after that. But people wouldn't spread out very far. Income would be down the crapper. There would be a lot more inactives without airports. For me airports opened this game up so much more. Without them I would have quit some time ago. The game would have become boring. But I only started playing 5 to 6 months ago so I can't fully understand the no airports game play. I feel they are a good thing......but leave it at what we already have. Don't take the ones we have away. -
@Kevster - "The Man" travels extensively, so my guess is that at least 90% (probably more) are from him going to those countries.
Before airports, we hopped. Yes, people actually did spread out quite far - across states. Since you didn't play then, you've made a lot of incorrect assumptions.
-
Mystery wrote:
@Kevster - "The Man" travels extensively, so my guess is that at least 90% (probably more) are from him going to those countries.
Before airports, we hopped. Yes, people actually did spread out quite far - across states. Since you didn't play then, you've made a lot of incorrect assumptions.
It's true, take a look at my wiki page and you can see how far I hopped from just two turf. I may not be as famous as some of the true hoppers out there, but I was hopping through entire countries and states long before airports came out. ✊
-
"The Man" wrote:
I can confirm this statement! "The man" was going for a record countries and all the US states way before the airport came. BTW I'm also against the airport even if I used them for strategy and would actually approve an airport in Alaska and even Dubai since you can't hop to those destinations.Mystery wrote:
@Kevster - "The Man" travels extensively, so my guess is that at least 90% (probably more) are from him going to those countries.
Before airports, we hopped. Yes, people actually did spread out quite far - across states. Since you didn't play then, you've made a lot of incorrect assumptions.
It's true, take a look at my wiki page and you can see how far I hopped from just two turf. I may not be as famous as some of the true hoppers out there, but I was hopping through entire countries and states long before airports came out. ✊
-
🔥zUntamed🔥 wrote:
I have to hop for 196 miles😰I'm fine with airports, but hopping 200 miles to get to one? NO THANKS!
-
Ʀɑƶɵʀвɑʗĸ🔥💢👣 wrote:
🔥zUntamed🔥 wrote:
I have to hop for 196 miles😰I'm fine with airports, but hopping 200 miles to get to one? NO THANKS!
😂
-
I think that if you are next to a municipal airport you should be able to at least fly to the closest international airport to travel and weaken the turf at the international airport by 20% for 4weeks instead of 10% for those who can not travel
-
automechguro wrote:
What?I think that if you are next to a municipal airport you should be able to at least fly to the closest international airport to travel and weaken the turf at the international airport by 20% for 4weeks instead of 10% for those who can not travel
1)It's 30% that gradually decreases over a month.
2) You're in Massachusetts, not Alaska. YOU can travel by hopping. -
Mystery wrote:
automechguro wrote:
What?I think that if you are next to a municipal airport you should be able to at least fly to the closest international airport to travel and weaken the turf at the international airport by 20% for 4weeks instead of 10% for those who can not travel
1)It's 30% that gradually decreases over a month.
2) You're in Massachusetts, not Alaska. YOU can travel by hopping.Sigh...
-
Hey "the man". If you are against airport (which I'm assuming you are 😂😂) how do you feel about maps being purchasable instead of looted? Like 50 to 100 million for 10 maps?
-
Kevster 🇺🇸💀🔫 wrote:
Hey "the man". If you are against airport (which I'm assuming you are 😂😂) how do you feel about maps being purchasable instead of looted? Like 50 to 100 million for 10 maps?
Doesn't bother me at all, if you're using maps it means you're hopping and using the GPS function, not magically crossing oceans in one click...
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC