No more airports 🔥✈
Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › No more airports 🔥✈-
I understand the fiscal reasons behind introducing the ones set to open 1 May, but if any aspect of a GPS game is going to survive let's keep the airports at the current locations and not add any more.
Thanks
-
I have a feeling that's not going to happen. Don't get me wrong. I'm in agreeeance with you but he's going to want to give every player a chance to fly and that means more ports
-
I know B, it just really saddens me to see Turf Wars lose that 'special something' it had and be just another game in the app store.
-
"The Man" wrote:
We'll have to wait an see if it's actually going to lose it. And whatever the combat limitation is or how long it lasts will play an important role here. If it's bad then using the gps will still have the advantage and more excitement I think.I know B, it just really saddens me to see Turf Wars lose that 'special something' it had and be just another game in the app store.
-
I've already predicted that most international air ports will be added to list, however that's as far as I think the list should go.
-
All new airports added should funnel through the current airports so it takes two flights if you use the ones that are added. (If they are)
-
Well, I think that more airports should be opened simply because the reason behind it has been attributed to tw becoming more playable. So, my question is when are other airports opening up since we cannot turf hop across Asia with the large bodies of water in between(not counting the dead spots. Oh wait, I understand, it's the geocoder's fault)
Hence open an airport where we can't turf hop to would be the perfect remedy.
-
Nick has already said that any airports opened will only connect to airports they connect to in real life
-
white & nerdy wrote:
You can get a flight to pretty much anywhere out the current airports open.Nick has already said that any airports opened will only connect to airports they connect to in real life
-
TinkerBelial wrote:
Agreement?I have a feeling that's not going to happen. Don't get me wrong. I'm in agreeeance with you but he's going to want to give every player a chance to fly and that means more ports
-
"The Man" wrote:
I'm with you but the floodgates are open now. The shame of it is there will be not be any players, from this point forward, that know the feeling of planning a future trip or hitting a random layover and planting turf. I know players that have driven 4 hours in the heat of battle to fight back, that now could just fly into town from multiple airports.I understand the fiscal reasons behind introducing the ones set to open 1 May, but if any aspect of a GPS game is going to survive let's keep the airports at the current locations and not add any more.
Thanks
The game will never be the same but if it has to happen I'll give it a shot.
-
It should be made so that each airport covers x mile radius regardless of how many airports the country has.
-
YOU wrote:
For example. LHR would cover a 500 mile radius meanin no other airport within this range would open. Nick has to maintain hopping as a travel method, it cant all be handed on a plate.It should be made so that each airport covers x mile radius regardless of how many airports the country has.
-
I agree.
-
VADAN wrote:
YOU wrote:
For example. LHR would cover a 500 mile radius meanin no other airport within this range would open. Nick has to maintain hopping as a travel method, it cant all be handed on a plate.It should be made so that each airport covers x mile radius regardless of how many airports the country has.
-
Once plane Tix are out the damage is already done. No sense in backtracking from that point.
-
\\// 👊🔨💀 wrote:
Once plane Tix are out the damage is already done. No sense in backtracking from that point.
True, but why open up more? Make the entitled mofo's do "some" work! 🙎
-
VADAN wrote:
Or better yet real life travel as a travel method which to me is the most rewarding of all.YOU wrote:
For example. LHR would cover a 500 mile radius meanin no other airport within this range would open. Nick has to maintain hopping as a travel method, it cant all be handed on a plate.It should be made so that each airport covers x mile radius regardless of how many airports the country has.
-
Just say no, the ones we have now are more than enough. People can hop towards them or god forbid "physically" travel to one. 👊👊
-
Hmm..maybe the complaints above make sense to those of you in big cities? Me, I'm Capo of 4 cities with "real world" airports, and it is anger inducing to know that not one has an in-game counterpart. Maybe this is actually saving my ass right now? Preventing bigger fish from flying in and eating me alive? It's possible, but it also means that even as the #1 player in my state under the categories of Influence and Area, and moving quickly onto the board under Wealth as well, that I can't actually play the game with anybody. The four people who were playing in my home town kept attacking me, so I took over the entire western half of my state (Colorado) to set them straight. They didn't like that, and they quit playing. BOOHOO. But now, I either have to leapfrog all the way down I-70 to find an airport in Denver, or just say "F" it, and play by myself. I'm just saying, it's kind of dumb to announce content across the entire game and then give it to only a handful of players.
-
Well I made a special trip to London from Lincoln to plant my turf, it now appears anyone in the world can simply fly there!! Hardly a gps game anymore.
I enjoyed looking through people's list of turfs to see where they had been, now it's just a farce. Il continue to play the game but won't be putting any more money into it seeing how I am no where near an airport either!!
-
Good point about airports being a bad idea for a GPS based game....but like I said in another thread, I wouldn't have any way to know that since the content wasn't made available to me. Maybe airports ARE bad....I wouldn't know.
-
They are bad for that reason too, used to be we were equal in game as far as traveling, if you didn't hop or physically go there you couldn't lay down turf.
Now, not so much, and some are luckier than others...
-
No more US airports, I think one in every country may be ok tho
-
It don't hurt gps thing much, (if any) think about it you still have to go there or hop to it, if make there and drop a turf near it, you should beable to use it. Correct me if I'm wrong.
-
The US has loads of airports, so I can see why you wouldn't want more, but the Uk isn't linked ti any land so it helped us hop somewhere.
I am in the opinion now that we have enough airports
-
Mystery wrote:
I agree.
-
It has certainly changed the game massively - and I have lost interest now almost completely. I travel a lot in real life - so the real gps factor was great. But In fairness it will probably atttract more players over time than it loses
-
Airport idea suck. This just make stronger mob player eaten the smaller one not locally but world wide now.
-
🎀BadMammaJamma wrote:
TinkerBelial wrote:
What?!I have a gutfeeling that's not going to happen. Don't get me right. I'm not in agreeeance with you but your going to want to give every player a chance to eat pie and that means more shoddy ports
-
the way nick worded his original announcement i'd expect the number of airports to double in a week, and triple in a month, then in 3 months probably every rl international airport will be available in game. that'd be way too many but thats how I took it.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC