Increase cap limit.
Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › Increase cap limit.-
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Cap limit needs to go up for bigger players. It is becoming more impossible to remove hostile players from cities. How can you remove a player that cam put down hundreds when you can only take 50? This males no sense and is becoming an unbalanced area of the game. Newer players suffer because we can't remove bullies. Raise the cap limit.
-
The only ways to do this would either be to have it mob based (which we all know would not go over well) or have it be a percentage of their total turf (which could easily be avoided by tearing down turf).
-
Belial Luciferi wrote:
👆👆👆 AgreeI've said it before and I'll say it again. Cap limit needs to go up for bigger players. It is becoming more impossible to remove hostile players from cities. How can you remove a player that cam put down hundreds when you can only take 50? This males no sense and is becoming an unbalanced area of the game. Newer players suffer because we can't remove bullies. Raise the cap limit.
-
Belial Luciferi wrote:
B, it requires multiple vendettas. 4 people in a V = 200 turf.... 2 V's= 400 turf and so on. Cap limit is fine. It takes a group to get things done. It's a forced democracy and it's in place to balance things.I've said it before and I'll say it again. Cap limit needs to go up for bigger players. It is becoming more impossible to remove hostile players from cities. How can you remove a player that cam put down hundreds when you can only take 50? This males no sense and is becoming an unbalanced area of the game. Newer players suffer because we can't remove bullies. Raise the cap limit.
-
Which, now that I thinknof it. Makes it funny that players whine when they have multiple Vendettas on them. They're supposed to have multiple V's on them if they are getting removed from a city.
-
\\// 👊🔨💀 wrote:
I domt think it should be this way though. It means the solo player is powerless to enact a removal.Belial Luciferi wrote:
B, it requires multiple vendettas. 4 people in a V = 200 turf.... 2 V's= 400 turf and so on. Cap limit is fine. It takes a group to get things done. It's a forced democracy and it's in place to balance things.I've said it before and I'll say it again. Cap limit needs to go up for bigger players. It is becoming more impossible to remove hostile players from cities. How can you remove a player that cam put down hundreds when you can only take 50? This males no sense and is becoming an unbalanced area of the game. Newer players suffer because we can't remove bullies. Raise the cap limit.
-
\\// 👊🔨💀 wrote:
Thats not balance. Thays being under powered. It shouldn't be that way.Belial Luciferi wrote:
B, it requires multiple vendettas. 4 people in a V = 200 turf.... 2 V's= 400 turf and so on. Cap limit is fine. It takes a group to get things done. It's a forced democracy and it's in place to balance things.I've said it before and I'll say it again. Cap limit needs to go up for bigger players. It is becoming more impossible to remove hostile players from cities. How can you remove a player that cam put down hundreds when you can only take 50? This males no sense and is becoming an unbalanced area of the game. Newer players suffer because we can't remove bullies. Raise the cap limit.
-
The game is not designed to be played as a dictator. This is why I stopped buying hench months ago. It's a team sport now.
-
\\// 👊🔨💀 wrote:
These types of games were never designed to be team sports. I shouldn't have to join an alliance just to be able to play.The game is not designed to be played as a dictator. This is why I stopped buying hench months ago. It's a team sport now.
-
No-One wrote:
You just want to be end all be all in LA and cap out Femme Fatale. If it wasn't for that you'd be on the other side saying V is right!\\// 👊🔨💀 wrote:
Thats not balance. Thays being under powered. It shouldn't be that way.Belial Luciferi wrote:
B, it requires multiple vendettas. 4 people in a V = 200 turf.... 2 V's= 400 turf and so on. Cap limit is fine. It takes a group to get things done. It's a forced democracy and it's in place to balance things.How can you remove a player that cam put down hundreds when you can only take 50? This males no sense and is becoming an unbalanced area of the game. Newer players suffer because we can't remove bullies. Raise the cap limit.
-
V is right this is a team sport now has been since vendettas came out. You can still remove people from cities, doing it alone would change game dynamic too much.
-
The Rhino wrote:
I domt think so. All players shouldn't be forced to join an alliance just to be able to play. A single player should still have relevance.V is right this is a team sport now has been since vendettas came out. You can still remove people from cities, doing it alone would change game dynamic too much.
-
I do think it should be based on turf limit, overall turf as well as level. Someone with a turf limit of 600 at lvl 48 should not have a daily cap limit of 12. Whereas a player with turf limit 35 level 100 has a limit of 50. That's not balanced.
-
And v and rhino you are both wrong. Vendettas were meant as a way to help smaller players. They were never meant to be a requirement for war.
-
No-One wrote:
The Rhino wrote:
I domt think so. All players shouldn't be forced to join an alliance just to be able to play. A single player should still have relevance.V is right this is a team sport now has been since vendettas came out. You can still remove people from cities, doing it alone would change game dynamic too much.
You do, but there should be drawback to being antisocial in an MMO. This is one of them
-
Solo player doesn't always mean you're antisocial. Take me. I'm hardly antisocial I have a huge team am a member of an alliance and have more allies to call in as needed. But I tend to lean toward handling my own problems.
-
No-One wrote:
Solo player doesn't always mean you're antisocial. Take me. I'm hardly antisocial I have a huge team am a member of an alliance and have more allies to call in as needed. But I tend to lean toward handling my own problems.
Adopt adapt and improve. This is not something that needs changing, you just need to change your strategy
-
The Rhino wrote:
You can only strategize around game systems so far. The average player turf limit keeps going up but not the cap limit. It makes sense that cap limit would go up to bring back the balanceNo-One wrote:
Solo player doesn't always mean you're antisocial. Take me. I'm hardly antisocial I have a huge team am a member of an alliance and have more allies to call in as needed. But I tend to lean toward handling my own problems.
Adopt adapt and improve. This is not something that needs changing, you just need to change your strategy
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC