Mob limit v capture limit

Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › Mob limit v capture limit

TDi Feb 26, 2010

Here's a helpful suggestion (well I think)
there should be a limit of who can capture your turf. Say you are 500 mob strong only people with let's say 750 mob members or below can capture your turf. Any member with more mob than you, if you can beat them you cam also capture (as some 1000+ mob strong only arm half of them).
This would be useful as it will stop people with 2000+ mob members taking your turf. It's pointless saying "be a man, do the right thing" and mob up, as it could take months to arm them once you've taken a week+ to add them.

What do you punks think?
Schulzie(Add 1234) Feb 26, 2010

I think that's retarded
TDi Feb 26, 2010

schulzie wrote:
I think that's retarded

because you've got 2000+ mob members?

Another plus to this is that some places are starting to get really crowded, some with all just one person.
The Rhino Feb 26, 2010

Not v realistic tho is it. I think it's ok as it is
👿Belial Feb 26, 2010

The problem with this idea is that your giving all advAntage to lower players and taking away any possible need to mob up. Why would you want a bigger mob when you can capture far more turfs with a smaller one? It simply makes no sense
Enforcer3306 Feb 26, 2010

belial wrote:
The problem with this idea is that your giving all advAntage to lower players and taking away any possible need to mob up. Why would you want a bigger mob when you can capture far more turfs with a smaller one? It simply makes no sense

belial put it really good
Schulzie(Add 1234) Feb 26, 2010

Enforcer3306 wrote:
belial wrote:
The problem with this idea is that your giving all advAntage to lower players and taking away any possible need to mob up. Why would you want a bigger mob when you can capture far more turfs with a smaller one? It simply makes no sense

belial put it really good
I think I put it better
TDi Feb 26, 2010

Ok, so it needs some work. But it doesn't stop you from attacking the turf.