What if every mobster could only be in X mobs?

Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › What if every mobster could only be in X mobs?

Boat Anchor Jan 4, 2011

What would happen if every mobster could only be in X mobs ( not sure how many x should be though).
1. More "real"
2. Less total mob
3. Would encourage more allying and communication.

Could even force players to "assign" their memberships every x days to get rid of stale mobsters.
Even the little guys would have some pull then, because players would want one of their x mob memberships to join their mob.
Vadan™ v2.0 Jan 4, 2011

I don't get what ur saying...
👿Belial Jan 4, 2011

Also I would want a full refund for all weapons purchases, total upkeep costs for the entire year and a full point return for turf limit purchases that are no longer needed to support a extremely reduced mob
👿Belial Jan 4, 2011

I don't see how it could be kept track of either. Plus you just can't change a system like this that drastically this late in the game. Many have spent good cash to support their mobs. And the current system is fine. New player absolutely do not deserve to compete in top level as they haven't put the effort in yet. Every player here has a chance to make it to top level. It's a good system.
💙ⒶⒹⒹ🅢🅦🅐🅖🅖🅔🅡💙 Jan 4, 2011

Belial stop whining, this idea won't work, a process for helping the small guys to mob up needs to be implanted instead.
👿Belial Jan 4, 2011

Add swagger wrote:
Belial stop whining, this idea won't work, a process for helping the small guys to mob up needs to be implanted instead.

They have one. Temp codes.
!Big Time3 Jan 4, 2011

How many codes have you punched belial
👿Belial Jan 4, 2011

!Big Time🌇🌊3 wrote:
How many codes have you punched belial

If you can't repunching. Well over 50 k
Dons Bro  Jan 5, 2011

Thats stupid if they put that in small people wouldnt be able to get any any mobs with any large players
Shibby420 Jan 8, 2011

A limit in mob members is a horrible thing to do, Storm8 did a similar thing without warning and alienated many players due to the action.
---- Jan 9, 2011

IF I said IF the system were to change the old way I see a change working would be, instead of code punching you can invite mobsters only in areas you physically go in to or hop to. But I do like the system now, those who but in the wrench time get the rewards.
Add: KOZY Jan 9, 2011

The only problem with the system now is that the players at the top can never be caught up to by newer players because of inactive and whatnot. Even if I punched through multiple code sites I could never get the same size mob as belial so long as he continues to punch temp codes.
bee ryan Jan 10, 2011

Kozy wrote:
The only problem with the system now is that the players at the top can never be caught up to by newer players because of inactive and whatnot. Even if I punched through multiple code sites I could never get the same size mob as belial so long as he continues to punch temp codes.

That's the benefit of playing as long as the top people have been. If it was easy to get there, it wouldn't be as big a deal as it is. Very few people will play long enough to get 10k, 15k, etc., so be willing to be one of those people and keep punching
LIONFURY Jan 10, 2011

Belial wrote:
Also I would want a full refund for all weapons purchases, total upkeep costs for the entire year and a full point return for turf limit purchases that are no longer needed to support a extremely reduced mob

Lol
Swagger Red Jan 10, 2011

bee ryan wrote:
That's the benefit of playing as long as the top people have been. If it was easy to get there, it wouldn't be as big a deal as it is. Very few people will play long enough to get 10k, 15k, etc., so be willing to be one of those people and keep punching And there lies the problem for the developer. If there is no hope of getting to the same level as the vets, why play at all.
This game is heading towards a scenario where financially it relies on a decreasing number of vets, who won't need to spend cash anyway.

Belial and Momo have 1000s of henchmen, neither are likely to ever need to spend like that again.

The game desperately needs to change to encourage new players to stay and spend.
Edward Kelly Jan 16, 2011

I get the point and like the concept... y'see joining multiple mobs is unrealistic. To be fair the limit should be one mob you can join, helps keep loyalties straight (but shotguns are better;). No limit on how many henchmen or players that can join you however, so Belial can rest easy.
👿Belial Jan 16, 2011

Edward Kelly wrote:
I get the point and like the concept... y'see joining multiple mobs is unrealistic. To be fair the limit should be one mob you can join, helps keep loyalties straight (but shotguns are better;). No limit on how many henchmen or players that can join you however, so Belial can rest easy.

Why the heck do I always hear this? I'm not even in the top ten for henchmen you know. I have my share but it's over stated.
👿Belial Jan 16, 2011

Edward Kelly wrote:
I get the point and like the concept... y'see joining multiple mobs is unrealistic. To be fair the limit should be one mob you can join, helps keep loyalties straight (but shotguns are better;). No limit on how many henchmen or players that can join you however, so Belial can rest easy.

This wouldn't work. mobs would be too small for anything decisive.