Home | News | Forums | Turf Map | Screenshots | Play Turf Wars Now!

Integration of alliances

• Fucking Oct 29, 2010

  Well. Such an obvious thing. Who wants to pay 100 don points for a tag? Why not integrate alliances into the game, with some additional features:
  Alliance members cannot attack each other
  If one alliance member is capo near another one, the non-capo pays less cop bribe.
  Alliance wall & forums.
  Integrated wars, separate from personal vendettas.
  Alliance members within 50 mile radius gives defense bonus, no attack bonus.
• Fucking Oct 29, 2010

  Alliance members can eal each other
  Treaties between alliances
  When a person with 750- mob less than u is attacked, the nearest 3 people are notified, and the attacks are grouped together. Then they can launch a group attack. 🔙anti-bully system
• ChainsawCharlie Oct 29, 2010

  Who says an alliance has to have a tag?
• Fucking Oct 29, 2010

  Oops. Massholes.
  Ok optional to have a tag.
• Fucking Oct 29, 2010

  To win a war, 2/3 members on one alliance must either surrender, be in the ER for 10 minutes simultaneously, or leave the alliance.
• glman Oct 29, 2010

  NOOOO
• Fucking Oct 29, 2010

  glman wrote:

  NOOOO
  

  Why... I hate people who say "HELL NO" without a reason.
• Leprechaun Oct 29, 2010

  glman wrote:

  NOOOO
  
• Fucking Oct 29, 2010

  WHY??? DONT U HAVE THE BRAINPOWER TO EXPLAIN urselves? Lol cap rage
• 👿Belial Oct 29, 2010

  I lile the idea of a imtegrated alloamcs system. I dont like your war system amd defemse bonuses at all though. Too balance shofting and would bring an end to the independent player
• 👿Belial Oct 29, 2010

  Being able to heal eacother is alsp balance destroying. Have to be carefull whem dealimg with these things
• 👿Belial Oct 29, 2010

  The more I think about it the more this whole thing is a bad idea. It would create an emd to the independent player
• BellaItaliana Oct 29, 2010

  I don't like "alliance members can't attack each other". You may need to attack alliance members sometimes to help yourself, help them, protect them, etc.
• ChainsawCharlie Oct 29, 2010

  BellaItaliana wrote:

  I don't like "alliance members can't attack each other". You may need to attack alliance members sometimes to help yourself, help them, protect them, etc.
  

  Agreed. And what family doesn't fight?
• cromerpac Oct 29, 2010

  I agree. The premise of the game is mobsters. There needs to be some backstabbing betrayal allowed.
• Howard Oct 29, 2010

  I agree we need an alliance system, but make it so that people without alliances (like myself) aren't punished for not being in one.
• Add: KOZY Oct 30, 2010

  Only part that is good is to be able to join an alliance in game. Leave the rest out. And maybe then you could have a private alliance forum. Only those in the alliance would be able to see that forum.
• dr p Oct 30, 2010

  Bad bad idea, what would happen to all the players that aren't in an alliance?
• cromerpac Oct 30, 2010

  They would play the game the same way they do now. There are alliances now through mobbing up and vandettas. This just organizes it more
• ChainsawCharlie Oct 31, 2010

  And that's why this a bad thing. The game does not need a system to automate organization between players.

  We have Vendettas. that is enough.

Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC