Alternate besides teammates

Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › Alternate besides teammates

Gwaido Jun 17, 2015

There are not enough active players left to create a powerful enough team to challenge the original players who have 70,000+ mob. There needs to be an alternative system to help new players. I suggest making it so that when one captures another's turf, they automatically get the teammates of that person as well. So i you capture turf from someone with 450 mob, you now get 450 more mob.
Chilling Jun 17, 2015

So, under this system, a player with a 80k mob who captures a turf from a player with a 70k mob, would now have a mob of 150k. Did you think this through?
Helixranger Jun 17, 2015

People will get too strong too quick.
john le sway Jun 17, 2015

This is impossible. A 32bit number cant go past 2 billion, this system will break very quickly.
lordgarrett99 Jun 17, 2015

john le sway wrote:
This is impossible. A 32bit number cant go past 2 billion, this system will break very quickly.

No it won't if you only get 10% of the targets mob, like if you cap someone with 1k mob, you would get 100 mob
████ⓙʘⓔ████ Jun 18, 2015

lordgarrett99 wrote:
john le sway wrote:
This is impossible. A 32bit number cant go past 2 billion, this system will break very quickly.

No it won't if you only get 10% of the targets mob, like if you cap someone with 1k mob, you would get 100 mob
I think something like this would be interesting but the numbers would have to be much smaller, like really only 10 from anyone. Would like to see something like this tho👍
⌖🔥ѺⱤǷӇΞƲδ🔥⌖ Jun 18, 2015

People my size would still get abused just to grow someone's mob, regardless of how much mob is given out...
Ojibwe Jun 19, 2015

‡☠ѺⱤǷӇΞƲδ☠‡ wrote:
People my size would still get abused just to grow someone's mob, regardless of how much mob is given out...

Right. I got no reason at all to abuse you now, but I'd be all over you for ten new mob members. :)
〓ＣＨＵＣＫＹ〓 Jun 23, 2015

Would there be a limit? If Dunn and I cap limit each other, could we get to about 16,000,000 mob? Or would I only get his mob once?

I think this idea is the best I've ever seen. 👍🏻
ƵΔǤ Jun 23, 2015

This will end up separating the gap between large and small players and hurt them instead of help them.
Ojibwe Jun 24, 2015

Hmm, i been rethinking this. How about capping someone is just like punching in a code? You'd get nothing if they already in your mob. Only one code is involved.
I suppose newbies might get hit hard but maybe it kicks in at level 50 or something.
Chilling Jun 24, 2015

Ojibwe wrote:
Hmm, i been rethinking this. How about capping someone is just like punching in a code? You'd get nothing if they already in your mob. Only one code is involved.
I suppose newbies might get hit hard but maybe it kicks in at level 50 or something.

Then more inactives would be capped
Ojibwe Jun 25, 2015

〓RAZOR EDGE〓 wrote:
Ojibwe wrote:
Hmm, i been rethinking this. How about capping someone is just like punching in a code? You'd get nothing if they already in your mob. Only one code is involved.
I suppose newbies might get hit hard but maybe it kicks in at level 50 or something.

Then more inactives would be capped
Oh, right.
Excelsior Mob™ Jul 1, 2015

The alternate for newer players is a vendetta. The second option is alliance. Third is politics. 4th is mobbing up. I put mobbing up at 4th cause it's the unlikely option for anyone new to try to punch their way to the top and dethrone someone 100x larger than them. Of course unless they reset or retire.
john le sway Jul 1, 2015

lordgarrett99 wrote:
john le sway wrote:
This is impossible. A 32bit number cant go past 2 billion, this system will break very quickly.

No it won't if you only get 10% of the targets mob, like if you cap someone with 1k mob, you would get 100 mob
Think about how often the 10-100k mob players cap. Even then, it would break pretty fast.