Ammo instead of upkeep.

Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › Ammo instead of upkeep.

Tratz Oct 9, 2010

Weapon upkeep seems a little redundant. Why not by crates of ammo (at an equally proportionate price to upkeep) and pay for attacking, when you intend on attacking. Defenders can be void to ammo expenditure to keep things fair (since people may not always afford ammo or check their cache).
👿Belial Oct 9, 2010

The system is Fine the way it is i think. Defnse shouldn't be free. Everyone would go with the duel combo as it'd be way more affordable with your plan. Making incomes go way higher for top plauers and changing game balance
Tratz Oct 9, 2010

I suppose so, but what if the cost of ammo scaled with the number of equipped weapons?
Stealth Bomber Oct 9, 2010

I kinda like this idea, id feel like i was getting a more accurate value for my money, rather then paying a small portion of every single income payment
Tratz Oct 26, 2010

Bump
glman Oct 26, 2010

Tratz wrote:
Bump

Srsly???
Corrupted1 Oct 26, 2010

Tratz wrote:
Bump

🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨🔨
👿Belial Oct 26, 2010

Still a horrible idea. Big players would make billions more.
lew10ant Oct 26, 2010

Belial wrote:
Still a horrible idea. Big players would make billions more.

They'd be in the 10 digits lol, at first seems good. But the money players would make would be ridiculous
punisher02 Oct 27, 2010

U gotta think about lower levels though, they would probably lose more money from attacking than anything else.
〓ZABLO〓 Oct 27, 2010

Belial wrote:
The system is Fine the way it is i think. Defnse shouldn't be free. Everyone would go with the duel combo as it'd be way more affordable with your plan. Making incomes go way higher for top plauers and changing game balance

What belial said