Vendetta Range Update
Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › Vendetta Range Update-
As several of the more combat-active players have noticed recently and in the past, there seems to be an issue with vendetta fight participation in some very specific cases. This isn't a bug – Vendetta participation distance is based on the distance between the defending players and the attacker, NOT the defending players' distance to the player or turf under attack.
For example, you and your turf are all located in the US, and Player X and their turf are all located in the UK. You both use the airport to build turf in South Korea. Let's say you start a vendetta with Player Y, who has turf in the US, UK, and South Korea, then target Player X. If Player X attacks Player Y's turf in South Korea, you won't join the fight – because you and Player X can't personally fight each other. However, if Player X attacks your turf in South Korea, you and Player Y will be join the fight, since you're the turf owner and Player Y can attack Player X personally.
-
If you think this scenario sounds confusing, I think you're right. The idea of basing vendetta participations on head-to-head distances made sense before airports let players claim turf around the world, but can be confusing now – and is probably the main source of confusion when players are left out of vendetta fights.
To make things clearer, we're considering basing vendetta participation on distance to the player/turf under attack – so anyone in the Vendetta who is personally located (or has turf) within 1000 miles/1600km of the defending turf may participate in the fight. This simplifies the vendetta fight participation rules for everyone, and will remove the confusing corner cases we're seeing now. We'd love to hear your thoughts on this proposed change.
In the meantime, a quick test to see if someone will be used in a defensive vendetta is to attack them personally – if you're too far away to attack them, they won't be used in the vendetta.
-
Makes sense. 👍
-
maybe its just me, but i thought thats how it was already
-
I would like the range to be a lot less than 1000 miles, why not 100 or 50 miles away?
-
℣ï₭ϊ₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
With all the new airports and new players 1000 was good in beginning make people have turf close by.I would like the range to be a lot less than 1000 miles, why not 100 or 50 miles away?
Not just sit in a couple spots and have coverage everywhere. Just go ahead and make it 10,000 miles.
-
I like 100 or 50 a well make people fighting actually be in location of fight than halfway across the country. This would also increase value of people getting capped out of an area.
-
Thanks nick. 1000 sounds good 👍
-
Also V starter must be in area this will cut down on mules starting Vs cause they will have to have turf in area.
Can't have your home mule start a V and then 3 other people do the work.
-
Just to clarify, the attack range has nearly always been 1000 miles, so that's not changing with the update.
-
YOU wrote:
From the turf that is.Thanks nick. 1000 sounds good 👍
-
So zero update then. Thanks
-
This might be a stupid question but why can't I personally attack someone who has turf in the same country as my turf? I read the sk example and it doesn't make sense to me. Can I only attack someone within 1000miles of where I am physically located according to my phone's GPS?
-
I.e is real life location what determines your position for attacking other players directly?
-
Sounds good 👍
-
yomama1064 wrote:
I thought it was already like this...maybe its just me, but i thought thats how it was already
-
I'm not the green knife in the draw and I failed algebra more than a few times. This is completely over my head. Can we use real life examples please.
Saba is located in Massachusetts & has turf all over the us & foreign countries via airports.
Coolio is in Shit hole Manchester UK & like Saba has turf in foreign countries via airports.If we are both in SK via airport what are the implications if we are in V's against eachother? Does it matter if either of us are starters vs just participants?
What if we attack someone who is located on the Easter islands?
These are serious questions.
Where the hell is Groucho when you need him? -
Sabasaul wrote:
My understanding is that under the current rules of Vendetta's you can attack Collio's turf but not Coolio. Under the new rules you can attack both Coolio and his turf.I'm not the green knife in the draw and I failed algebra more than a few times. This is completely over my head. Can we use real life examples please.
Saba is located in Massachusetts & has turf all over the us & foreign countries via airports.
Coolio is in Shit hole Manchester UK & like Saba has turf in foreign countries via airports.If we are both in SK via airport what are the implications if we are in V's against eachother? Does it matter if either of us are starters vs just participants?
What if we attack someone who is located on the Easter islands?
These are serious questions.
Where the hell is Groucho when you need him?I hope that is right, someone correct me if I'm wrong.
-
👍👍👍 I haven't been in a vendetta for a long time, but this does make a lot more sense
-
This is a pointless change. More important things are needing to be changed. FYI I thought this was already how it worked. Clearly isn't a big deal if I thought it was like this already
-
Wait, so if everybody involved has turf in the same place but are physically located too far from each other to fight, i can't help defend my compatriat's turf? That's plain stupid.
-
It's a fine clarification but while you're on it why not decrease the range to 150 miles or 500 at minimum. Before airports a larger distance made some sense but some effort should be made to be near a fight. It also provides some value to territory and "cap outs" which are pretty meaningless at the moment. I would also second the idea that if the v creator is not within that range 1k currently or whatever potential distance it might change to then the vendetta won't work. At least make folks spend some time on their mule accounts.
-
℣ї₭ï₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
I second this 👍It's a fine clarification but while you're on it why not decrease the range to 150 miles or 500 at minimum. Before airports a larger distance made some sense but some effort should be made to be near a fight. It also provides some value to territory and "cap outs" which are pretty meaningless at the moment. I would also second the idea that if the v creator is not within that range 1k currently or whatever potential distance it might change to then the vendetta won't work. At least make folks spend some time on their mule accounts.
-
℣ȉ₭ȉ₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
3rd. Decrease mule account usefulness and make cap outs more important. Great ideas👍℣ї₭ï₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
I second this 👍It's a fine clarification but while you're on it why not decrease the range to 150 miles or 500 at minimum. Before airports a larger distance made some sense but some effort should be made to be near a fight. It also provides some value to territory and "cap outs" which are pretty meaningless at the moment. I would also second the idea that if the v creator is not within that range 1k currently or whatever potential distance it might change to then the vendetta won't work. At least make folks spend some time on their mule accounts.
-
℣ї₭ï₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
I oddly have to agree with this Viking. 1000 miles may still be fair but I wouldn't oppose 500 miles either.It's a fine clarification but while you're on it why not decrease the range to 150 miles or 500 at minimum. Before airports a larger distance made some sense but some effort should be made to be near a fight. It also provides some value to territory and "cap outs" which are pretty meaningless at the moment. I would also second the idea that if the v creator is not within that range 1k currently or whatever potential distance it might change to then the vendetta won't work. At least make folks spend some time on their mule accounts.
-
Funky Buffalo wrote:
👍👍👍👍℣ȉ₭ȉ₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
3rd. Decrease mule account usefulness and make cap outs more important. Great ideas👍℣ї₭ï₦Ǥ👹 wrote:
I second this 👍It's a fine clarification but while you're on it why not decrease the range to 150 miles or 500 at minimum. Before airports a larger distance made some sense but some effort should be made to be near a fight. It also provides some value to territory and "cap outs" which are pretty meaningless at the moment. I would also second the idea that if the v creator is not within that range 1k currently or whatever potential distance it might change to then the vendetta won't work. At least make folks spend some time on their mule accounts.
-
+1 for v creator being in range
-
I am so confused
-
〓ＦＡＣＨＡＮ〓 wrote:
I'm glad you chimed in. I don't think me saying I was confused carried any validity with it. I'm always confused so they just took it as par for the corse.I am so confused
-
qweeter1997 wrote:
You mean you haven't been in a vendetta ever.👍👍👍 I haven't been in a vendetta for a long time, but this does make a lot more sense
-
So for instance, if im kicking sabasauls ass in the UK and he gets Lefty Noodle to V me, if i cap Lefty Noodle out of germany and england, i still get to continue kicking sabasauls ass there until he gets Lefty Noodle to fly back?👹👍
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC