FEEDBACK NEEDED: pagination of players' turf lists
Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › FEEDBACK NEEDED: pagination of players' turf lists-
★MΛVΞЯICK★ wrote:
Lol loose some wieght big guy 👌 I'd be alright with this.YOU wrote:
I fell discriminated, I'm not that fat! 😢Who you calling turf juggernauts? And personally I like it this way... It's kind of in my advantage that it takes forever to scroll my turf list.
-
It should be around 500 turf per page any less and it makes searching for pins too easy as multiple players can then take a page each.
In addition if a player has lots of Turf and too many pages the idea of pushing next 40/50 times to search through a list is equally pointless as it will be impossible to search and possibly still cause problems with loading so some sort of balance is required.
I like the idea of a toggle between the earliest or latest date created.
Date captured should bare no relevance as capping a turf to have a turf in a new area in the middle of the list is a useful and common tactic. Using the capture date would remove that and take away a useful attacking/defensive advantage IMO.
Thanks for consulting too 👍
-
Wow. First we put publically visible turf timers so the enemy knows when the turf will mature and the attacks will begin (Score: Fog of war -1, Noob Value +1)
Then we shrunk the capo list so no more scrolling down required (FoW -2, N +2)
Now, we are going to have a turf list where all you have to do if someone is trying to hop away is refresh the list and cap the top of the list. Refresh and cap. No more searching the map for changes in an area, etc. (FoW -3, N+3)
Next, you will take away the ability to change your iDevice's language set so you can plant turf in a foreign language right next to a normal turf and it doesn't show up in the English list. Please not that!
Not liking the new sorted by ownership list. Sneaking up and planting turf or capping to hide the recent activity would be impossible.
-G
-
⌖🔥Groucho🔥⌖ wrote:
I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure Apple wouldn't approve a TW update that won't allow users to change the language on their phone!Next, you will take away the ability to change your iDevice's language set so you can plant turf in a foreign language right next to a normal turf and it doesn't show up in the English list. Please not that!
-G
-Ҝ
-
😡ҝعყʂعཞ😈Տȫƶع😡 wrote:
⌖🔥Groucho🔥⌖ wrote:
I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure Apple wouldn't approve a TW update that won't allow users to change the language on their phone!Next, you will take away the ability to change your iDevice's language set so you can plant turf in a foreign language right next to a normal turf and it doesn't show up in the English list. Please not that!
-G
-Ҝ
Changing the language isn't the issue. Using it as an exploit to get more capos is.
-
I see the argument for 500 turf as apposed to 50, however, the reality is I think 50 per page is enough as your realistically only checking recent movement rather then long term? With 50 on a page you will pretty much see how that player has expanded and where/ how with this update. If it stayed at 50 could it possible to have the location directly underneath so a quick glance could show exact movement without having to click on turf name, EG
MY TURF
Sydney
BOBS
London
If this example was possible I think most ppl wouldn't mind it being restricted to 50 per page? -
🇬🇧Pablo🇬🇧 wrote:
I see the argument for 500 turf as apposed to 50, however, the reality is I think 50 per page is enough as your realistically only checking recent movement rather then long term? With 50 on a page you will pretty much see how that player has expanded and where/ how with this update. If it stayed at 50 could it possible to have the location directly underneath so a quick glance could show exact movement without having to click on turf name, EG
MY TURF
Sydney
BOBS
London
If this example was possible I think most ppl wouldn't mind it being restricted to 50 per page?If you have 50 turf per page then maverick would have 200+ pages which would be impossible to check through.
In addition this would take ages to load and would probably crash too.
-
With the current list turf are listed by date created so capping an old turf pushes that turf into a random place within the turf list and despite its "recent" movement it doesn't show (a useful tactic) the date a turf is capped should NOT be used when listing turf as it will be too easy to check the last turf and just cap away.
-
The"Accountant" wrote:
👍With the current list turf are listed by date created so capping an old turf pushes that turf into a random place within the turf list and despite its "recent" movement it doesn't show (a useful tactic) the date a turf is capped should NOT be used when listing turf as it will be too easy to check the last turf and just cap away.
-
Is it possible to make scrolling versus pages an option?
A player with just 2,000 turf would end up with 40 pages at 50 a page. That's a lot of pages to go through unless there's some quick way to get through them.
-
Mystery wrote:
If we get an option, I'd like to set how my page is displayed. Not how I see other pages.Is it possible to make scrolling versus pages an option?
A player with just 2,000 turf would end up with 40 pages at 50 a page. That's a lot of pages to go through unless there's some quick way to get through them.
Perhaps if fewer than _____ turf, you get the option. Once you clear that number, pages are only option
-
😡ҝعყʂعཞ😈Տȫƶع😡 wrote:
Mystery wrote:
If we get an option, I'd like to set how my page is displayed. Not how I see other pages.Is it possible to make scrolling versus pages an option?
A player with just 2,000 turf would end up with 40 pages at 50 a page. That's a lot of pages to go through unless there's some quick way to get through them.
Perhaps if fewer than _____ turf, you get the option. Once you clear that number, pages are only option
-
Great feedback! There are a lot of strategies that would be affected by this change,
the Fog of War being one of them. When it comes to displaying players' turf lists we have to balance these concerns with performance and stability for all of our players.As a result, we're going to keep the order the same as it is now, and paginate with a hundred or more turf per page (exact number TBD).
Thanks everyone for the detailed feedback!
-
nick wrote:
You are welcome nick and thanks for the game👍Great feedback! There are a lot of strategies that would be affected by this change,
the Fog of War being one of them. When it comes to displaying players' turf lists we have to balance these concerns with performance and stability for all of our players.As a result, we're going to keep the order the same as it is now, and paginate with a hundred or more turf per page (exact number TBD).
Thanks everyone for the detailed feedback!
-
nick wrote:
Thanks for taking all our recommendations into consideration. Did you implement anything yet, I didn't notice any changes.To solve this problem, we're going to start paginating this list next Monday (Feb 11th), but before we do, we'd like to hear your feedback on the details. Here are the details on the new vs old lists:
-
The update is live now – turf order has been left unchanged, and the turf/page has been increased to 500.
-
nick wrote:
Well it works, I can see my own list too, only 95 pages.The update is live now – turf order has been left unchanged, and the turf/page has been increased to 500.
-
nick wrote:
It's working fine. The only issue I have is the scrolling between pages on the 'middle pages'. What if I want to jumpy straight to page 8 from page 6?The update is live now – turf order has been left unchanged, and the turf/page has been increased to 500.
[PREV] [1]...[7] [8] [9]...[X] [NEXT]
I can't. I have to go to page 7 then 6. Why not have (in this example) page 7 + 9 removed so you can pick 2 pages (or more) from the current page you're on. If you need the adjacent pages you have [PREV] and [NEXT] for that. Currently you're just doubling up on that option.
-
Is there a possibility of a 'fast forward'/'rewind' option so I can jump 5 pages in either direction to save time please?
-
It also jumps to the top of the page when you go to the next page. Is there any chance of changing this?
As above though thanks for listening to feedback 👍
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC