Turf Torture

Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › Turf Torture

『тӈԑ•ʟɛɢɪɵɳ』 Jul 20, 2012

What if we could do more than just attack and capture turfs (and use loot on)? With this idea, when you select a players turf, there's a scroll wheel with different options on what you want to do to the turf. Here are some ideas.
Vandalize: Decreases targets turfs influence by 5 for 1 hour. Costs 50k to preform.
Graffiti: Leeches 3 influence from target turf to the nearest turf of yours. Note: your turf must be in capping range; costs 60k to preform.
Rob Decreases target turfs income by 10k for two hours. Costs 110k to preform.
Sabotage Decreases target turfs influence by 5 and decreases income by 5k for two hours. Costs 250k to preform.
Leave any other ideas below!
hahax_01 Jul 20, 2012

And tell me the benefits of these 'torture'
〓SHЯIИUT〓 Jul 20, 2012

Cap it or tax it. Why fuck around? There are car bombs and balaclava's to do this.
Spenman1 Jul 20, 2012

💀ՏɧʀɪɲʉϮ💀+₅₅₂ wrote:
Cap it or tax it. Why fuck around? There are car bombs and balaclava's to do this.

Agreed.
its Dylan Jul 20, 2012

As much as I like this, I think it would just give more advantage to the wealthy in an already highly unbalanced game environment.
☠།༨རསᏩཥརས☠ Jul 20, 2012

💀ՏɧʀɪɲʉϮ💀+₅₅₂ wrote:
Cap it or tax it. Why fuck around? There are car bombs and balaclava's to do this.

👍
Admiral May Jul 21, 2012

The ideas are alright, but I am fIne with what we have now. If they were added, the prices should be between 5-20 times the cost you have listed. If they were as cheap as you have them a person could cheaply cause an entire city of turf to go down 5 inf. per turf...
BAT SMURF Jul 21, 2012

Troll attackers.
࿇ℛ✘Ꮓ∅ᎡᏰᎪϾᏦ࿇ Jul 21, 2012

Admiral May wrote:
The ideas are alright, but I am fIne with what we have now. If they were added, the prices should be between 5-20 times the cost you have listed. If they were as cheap as you have them a person could cheaply cause an entire city of turf to go down 5 inf. per turf...

Or Make it a loot item and it'll be a lot less far fetched
Mystery Jul 21, 2012

I don't see the point. It would be cheaper for me to just attack the turfs & I'd probably win money. If I'm not big enough to win against the person, then it wouldn't be a good idea for me to do these things to them.
ᎡᎯ༈ᏑᏲ Jul 21, 2012

Mystery wrote:
I don't see the point. It would be cheaper for me to just attack the turfs & I'd probably win money. If I'm not big enough to win against the person, then it wouldn't be a good idea for me to do these things to them.

Like always you make a great point. I don't want to attack bigger people.
boss ante Jul 27, 2012

Robbery should decrease the turf income with X% (these % should go to the attacker) depending on attack/defence ratio(?), that makes sense dosent it?
boss ante Jul 27, 2012

X% till next payout*