Vendettas Cost Money
Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › Vendettas Cost Money-
Vendettas are created and disbanded constantly with 90% of them being created off a whim or a temper tantrum.
If players had to pay a fee, even if it is a percentage of their total cash amount, I think it would make players a little more cognitive of what they are doing. Wars cost money, why not front some money for it?
-
Once the Vendetta is created, the player is automatically charged the fee. Perhaps those that join the Vendetta could pay a fee as well.
-
I'm kinda half and half on this. If someone is getting turf capped, wont they need as much money as possible?
-
ㄎㄗㄤㄢㄊㄤ 👣👊🔨 wrote:
That's where the percentage thing comes in. 👍I'm kinda half and half on this. If someone is getting turf capped, wont they need as much money as possible?
-
I love this.
-
I don't think it should be a percentage. If it is a percentage, then the richer players will have to pay lots more than the poorer players. The only senseless vendettas are typically the ones started by smaller players. I think there should be a fee, but it should stay at a flat rate, not a percentage.
-
Wegsies wrote:
That's the point. If a player joins a vendetta, they have to weigh their options.I don't think it should be a percentage. If it is a percentage, then the richer players will have to pay lots more than the poorer players. The only senseless vendettas are typically the ones started by smaller players. I think there should be a fee, but it should stay at a flat rate, not a percentage.
If it is going to hurt my bank account, I have to decide if it is worth it for me to join.
-
FREE☠MASON wrote:
Expanding on this idea, what would you think if the winners of the war (the first to disband) could collect the fee from the other V? Gain the spoils of war?Wegsies wrote:
That's the point. If a player joins a vendetta, they have to weigh their options.I don't think it should be a percentage. If it is a percentage, then the richer players will have to pay lots more than the poorer players. The only senseless vendettas are typically the ones started by smaller players. I think there should be a fee, but it should stay at a flat rate, not a percentage.
If it is going to hurt my bank account, I have to decide if it is worth it for me to join.
-
-1 it's hard enough getting players into a V. Add fees and that will make it even less likely for players to join a V. And really who cares of they set up a V during a temper tantrum and it goes nowhere. That's hilarious that they're taking a 40% defense hit for the length of the V for nothing. Theres a douche bag right now that's had me targeted for the last few days. Hes 4k and no1 has joined yet. lol. Tick tock, 4 days left.
-
There is potential here. My thought is scaled % fee for the originator of the V only. They need to be committed to recouping their investment from their opposition.
This way it won't affect the big boys wars. Smaller % applies the bigger the Mob so it costs more but not as much considering their overall income and mob.
-
I like it.
-
I like it! Seems every smaller player has a better inf to mob ratio than me anyways, it's just ingame money. 👍
-
How about if they just charged money for making a THREAD in the V forum (not a post)?
-
Mystery wrote:
+1How about if they just charged money for making a THREAD in the V forum (not a post)?
I think costing $ to start the V but it is free to join one. -
Terrible idea 👎
-
Not sure I like this idea. If Im a noob how can I afford to start a v to get some Bully off my back. ?
-
Jon Allen wrote:
That would be extremely confusing as to who 'won' the war from a computers point of view...FREE☠MASON wrote:
Expanding on this idea, what would you think if the winners of the war (the first to disband) could collect the fee from the other V? Gain the spoils of war?Wegsies wrote:
That's the point. If a player joins a vendetta, they have to weigh their options.I don't think it should be a percentage. If it is a percentage, then the richer players will have to pay lots more than the poorer players. The only senseless vendettas are typically the ones started by smaller players. I think there should be a fee, but it should stay at a flat rate, not a percentage.
If it is going to hurt my bank account, I have to decide if it is worth it for me to join.
-
Hyena wrote:
Or what if there is a Max cost. Like 5 mil.There is potential here. My thought is scaled % fee for the originator of the V only. They need to be committed to recouping their investment from their opposition.
This way it won't affect the big boys wars. Smaller % applies the bigger the Mob so it costs more but not as much considering their overall income and mob.
-
Add TOW wrote:
Get the person that is going to help you to make the v...Not sure I like this idea. If Im a noob how can I afford to start a v to get some Bully off my back. ?
-
Pr3zzy wrote:
I dont think anybody should get the money back. It's a fine, not the buy in on poker!😜Jon Allen wrote:
That would be extremely confusing as to who 'won' the war from a computers point of view...FREE☠MASON wrote:
Expanding on this idea, what would you think if the winners of the war (the first to disband) could collect the fee from the other V? Gain the spoils of war?Wegsies wrote:
That's the point. If a player joins a vendetta, they have to weigh their options.✂.
If it is going to hurt my bank account, I have to decide if it is worth it for me to join.
-
this is the best idea
-
👎 only on the basis that fights should be encouraged not made even more expensive.
If people want to start a v for something petty then fine hopefully it escalates to a war 😏🔥
-
mr joble wrote:
Tremendis idea
-
Ehh not the best idea
-
I love that idea
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC