No hp lost if turf attk fails

Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › No hp lost if turf attk fails

djkmac Jan 26, 2010

I think Its stupid how someone can capture ure turf as long as they win once. Today someon captured my turf winning only 2 out of 10 attacks. This does not make sense IMO. What u all think?
djkmac Jan 27, 2010

I'm bumping because this is a flaw, ure turf should not lose hp if it wins. One should have to win to DMG turf
Tom Hagen Jan 27, 2010

Cuz in fights, the winner is always unscathed?
djkmac Jan 28, 2010

No one wins a war by losing 80 percent of the fights unless you have more resources, this game uses stamina to determine how many times u can attack. While the real world uses man power, how many times can you send 100k troops into battle without running out if troops. The player should have won 8/80 fights to capture my teritory. This helps the reason on having sta as a stat.
Tom Hagen Jan 28, 2010

I agree in that case it is lame and also agree winning fights should result in less damage taken vs the attacker, which I believe already happens.

To caputure a turf after all other requirements ate met, you just have to win 1 fight at the end. I like it like that, it shouldn't be 100% impossible when the players are close in power.
Scarpone Jan 28, 2010

I'm with u guys also when u win a fight we always lose a per set amount of health that's always the same no matter what. I think it should ajust do to your men and guns. So you never lose the same Amount of health after say 10 hits in a row
djkmac Jan 28, 2010

I think the set dmg now is 8 if u lose, so really just attk 9 times win or lose
G-BeAtZ Jan 28, 2010

Yea it should be changed. Ether lose fewer health or lose none at all when you win. I got a guy tryin to take my turf but he loses every fight and yet I still lose 8 health in my property