👊Veteran only forum👊
Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › 👊Veteran only forum👊-
🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 wrote:
Um, not to be a dick but you seem to do a lot of "throwing up" on the forums. And I think you are entitled to say whatever's on your mind. People can read it, or click to the next topic. I like hearing the vets and the newbs and everyone in between, its a rich blend of different people and it makes for an interesting convo. I hate rules that's all.I support this. I don't think mob size should be 10k it think it should be 5k. Anyone, even non punchers, will be at 5k after about a year, at minimum.
I don't think "commitment" to code punching or map playing should play a part in forum experience.👍👍👍👍👍👍
NOT everyone pays.
And he said EVERYONE could read.
This just requires you to LEARN the ropes before throwing up all over the forums. Good call man. -
Non-vets should'nt have to recreate a thread again in GD so they too can partake in the discussion.
If they do this then they would be violating the TOS (it's not allowed to recreate the same topic in multiple forums)
-
dagamer01 wrote:
It wouldn't be exactly the same topic. For example, look up the thread "Women's Responses to Man Laws."Non-vets should'nt have to recreate a thread again in GD so they too can partake in the discussion.
If they do this then they would be violating the TOS (it's not allowed to recreate the same topic in multiple forums)
-
I'm not a vet not even close but you should make a vet only forum it's a great idea
-
ℍӭℜʘî€👿ℬє₳ṩƬ🔫🔴🌆 wrote:
Non-vets should'nt have to recreate a thread again in GD so they too can partake in the discussion.
If they do this then they would be violating the TOS (it's not allowed to recreate the same topic in multiple forums)
Why would anyone want to partake in a discussion on a forum they can only read anyway? And with the different folks replying, even if a thread was created by someone else in the GD forum the direction of that thread would be totally different from the Veteran forum. Guess I'm just not seeing the problem you're concerned about.
-
Have you noticed that every player opposing this are the ones that don't mob up at all?
-
☆ A〽NESTY ☆ wrote:
I supported it. I support many forums. Even ones I'm not interested in or qualified for.Have you noticed that every player opposing this are the ones that don't mob up at all?
And I don't punch codes. -
💀ՏɧʀɪɲʉϮ💀+₅₅₂ wrote:
Well u sounded like one anyways. You probably can't help it. Go see my other suggestion. It promotes people being allowed, without any resistance or criticism to further continue these types of things in more detail.🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 wrote: Snipped
Um, not to be a dick but you seem to do a lot of "throwing up" on the forums. And I think you are entitled to say whatever's on your mind. People can read it, or click to the next topic. I like hearing the vets and the newbs and everyone in between, its a rich blend of different people and it makes for an interesting convo. I hate rules that's all. -
🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 wrote:
I'm not saying all those who don't mob up are against this but I'm saying all who are against it are people that don't mob up. Its like the people who oppose it are a subset of people who don't mob up.☆ A〽NESTY ☆ wrote:
I supported it. I support many forums. Even ones I'm not interested in or qualified for.Have you noticed that every player opposing this are the ones that don't mob up at all?
And I don't punch codes. -
☆ A〽NESTY ☆ wrote:
🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 wrote:
I'm not saying all those who don't mob up are against this but I'm saying all who are against it are people that don't mob up. Its like the people who oppose it are a subset of people who don't mob up.☆ A〽NESTY ☆ wrote:
I supported it. I support many forums. Even ones I'm not interested in or qualified for.Have you noticed that every player opposing this are the ones that don't mob up at all?
And I don't punch codes.Of course players who don't mob up would oppose this idea, they'd never be allowed to post and only read what's in there. ✊
-
I'm mobbing up, slowly, and I'm against it. But I'm starting to see why you want one. But I don't think it will happen.
Hey Nick!, you should comment. Settle this drama! -
"The Man" wrote:
guess im a vet by these standardsIt's been suggested many times, so here it is again.
-Level 100
-Been playing at least a year
-10,000+ mob membersAnyone can view, only the players meeting the minimum requirements can post. ✊
-
How do you use diplomacy ?
-
zracer1z wrote:
Same way you use a frisbee.How do you use diplomacy ?
-
Ǥ͟г̴єɛɳϻa͞ŋ wrote:
What? 😂😂😂zracer1z wrote:
Same way you use a frisbee.How do you use diplomacy ?
-
Mystery wrote:
Throw it out there and hope it works. And hope someone's guard dog doesn't tear it to shreds!Ǥ͟г̴єɛɳϻa͞ŋ wrote:
What? 😂😂😂zracer1z wrote:
Same way you use a frisbee.How do you use diplomacy ?
-
"The Man" wrote:
People might want to voice their opinions o a particular topic in the vet forums. If they can't post their they may create te thread again in GD and reference the vet forum thread.Why would anyone want to partake in a discussion on a forum they can only read anyway? And with the different folks replying, even if a thread was created by someone else in the GD forum the direction of that thread would be totally different from the Veteran forum. Guess I'm just not seeing the problem you're concerned about.
Whether the direction of the recreated thread is different or not is not the issue. As per the current TOS recreating threads from other forums is against the rules. -
ℍӭℜʘî€👿ℬє₳ṩƬ🔫🔴🌆 wrote:
"The Man" wrote:
People might want to voice their opinions o a particular topic in the vet forums. If they can't post their they may create te thread again in GD and reference the vet forum thread.Why would anyone want to partake in a discussion on a forum they can only read anyway? And with the different folks replying, even if a thread was created by someone else in the GD forum the direction of that thread would be totally different from the Veteran forum. Guess I'm just not seeing the problem you're concerned about.
Whether the direction of the recreated thread is different or not is not the issue. As per the current TOS recreating threads from other forums is against the rules.Then they mob up, put in their time, and reply once they meet the criteria.
-
From my view, I see few problems with this. For one, exactly how many people are going to care about things on a forum they can't even read? Another problem is that there is a semi-visible division between veteran players and small players already. A vet-only forum would probably just boost this division.
-
I like it though I couldn't post (😔I love the forums) itsa good idea
-
"The Man" wrote:
I just think it should be mob based.☆ A〽NESTY ☆ wrote:
🔰ਸᏧᏧ ℜⱥ༏Ҡℴ ц🔰 wrote:
I'm not saying all those who don't mob up are against this but I'm saying all☆ A〽NESTY ☆ wrote:
I supported it. I support many forums. Even ones I'm not interested in or qualified for.Have you noticed that every player opposing this are the ones that don't mob up at all?
And I don't punch codes.Of course players who don't mob up would oppose this idea, they'd never be allowed to post and only read what's in there. ✊
I'm only here for the forums really, so I don't mob up. I don't like the idea of all the decent posters, aka the vets, moving to forum section where I can't comment it interact. Leaving me alone with all idiots and trolls.
But whatever you guys think is best. -
Shouldn't be mob based***
Darn my typing skills. -
Super, we all feel your pain, forums are full of idiots right now. 😒
-
🔰Superyan🔰 wrote:
I think if you've been playing 2 years and aren't a troll (if you were you would have been forum banned), then that should be enough to bypass the other requirements.Shouldn't be mob based***
Darn my typing skills. -
"The Man" wrote:
ℍӭℜʘî€👿ℬє₳ṩƬ🔫🔴🌆 wrote: People might want to voice their opinions o a particular topic in the vet forums. If they can't post their they may create te thread again in GD and reference the vet forum thread.
Whether the direction of the recreated thread is different or not is not the issue. As per the current TOS recreating threads from other forums is against the rules.Then they mob up, put in their time, and reply once they meet the criteria.
What if the thread dies by the time they become eligible to post.
But whatever, you can have your vet forum. If I see something I'd like to comment on, I'll just recreate it in GD (if I don't meet posting requirements at the time of me wanting to comment)
-
"The Man" wrote:
Oy, not everyone that doesn't qualify for this forum is a troll or idiot. I know that's not what you're suggesting, but if you interpret it as how it was posted it would sound that way.Super, we all feel your pain, forums are full of idiots right now. 😒
-
I think somethink like this could happen, but that shouldn't be the only way to get in. I think that level 100 shows enough; you've been here a while and know what is and isn't acceptable in the forums. There also should be another way to get in. There are plenty of worthy players who don't meet those requirements. Maybe the dev team invites you, or if you haven't been banned by a certain level you can get in.
-
*Something
-
🔥INFERNØ🔥 wrote:
Swagger has been banned before, are you saying he shouldn't get in?I think somethink like this could happen, but that shouldn't be the only way to get in. I think that level 100 shows enough; you've been here a while and know what is and isn't acceptable in the forums. There also should be another way to get in. There are plenty of worthy players who don't meet those requirements. Maybe the dev team invites you, or if you haven't been banned by a certain level you can get in.
-
Although I am nowhere near being a vet, I think the vets deserve a vet only forum.
![[][]](https://turfwarsapp.com/img/app/ajax-forbutton.gif)
Purchase Respect Points NEW! · Support · Turf Map · Terms · Privacy
©2021 MeanFreePath LLC