Capture / Attacking Turf

Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › Capture / Attacking Turf

FRΞΞ☠ΜΛSΟΠ Apr 1, 2012

I think that if a player has a turf over 86 and it is in range to cap, then the influence rule and the player's level should no longer play a factor in whether or not that turf can be capped.

I have found several players who are low level and low influence and I cannot cap their turf, even if the turf is at 138.
✙Baron✙ Apr 1, 2012

Players should be allowed to camp at low levels. If they have a 138 they are obviously at least level 60.
Brakeall Apr 1, 2012

✙Baron✙ wrote:
Players should be allowed to camp at low levels. If they have a 138 they are obviously at least level 60.

I think I remember there was a way to put anything on a turf before the required level, but you couldn't take it off. But I don't remember exactly how...
ᎢᎻᎬ ᏟᏞᎪᏚᏚᏆᏟ Apr 1, 2012

✙Baron✙ wrote:
Players should be allowed to camp at low levels. If they have a 138 they are obviously at least level 60.

Well there could be a low leveled person who could've capped it I suppose.
Ꭱ3V Apr 1, 2012

Brakeall🇺🇸💀🔫 wrote:
✙Baron✙ wrote:
Players should be allowed to camp at low levels. If they have a 138 they are obviously at least level 60.

I think I remember there was a way to put anything on a turf before the required level, but you couldn't take it off. But I don't remember exactly how...
Yeah there was a way to backdoor it. You go into use item for turf, and you could equip it from there. I discovered that by accident when I was new. But you can't unequip it until reaching the proper level.
⚡JUNIOR⚡ Apr 2, 2012

✙Baron✙ wrote:
Players should be allowed to camp at low levels. If they have a 138 they are obviously at least level 60.

they capped it off of someone else most likely
FRΞΞ☠ΜΛSΟΠ Apr 3, 2012

These players are obviously capping these turf. I am simply referring to the fact that if a player has turf over 86, it should be capable regardless of their level or influence.
FRΞΞ☠ΜΛSΟΠ Apr 3, 2012

If a player is at level 5 but has a turf at 87 or higher, it should be treated the same as a player at 85 so long as it is within capture range.
1337Pete Apr 3, 2012

It makes sense, gives low level guys no repercussions from taxing a bigger mobster. I think there was an new Loot idea floating around where you would be able to steal loot from a turf without capping it. That idea would work perfectly in this situation.
Mystery Apr 3, 2012

1337Pete wrote:
It makes sense, gives low level guys no repercussions from taxing a bigger mobster. I think there was an new Loot idea floating around where you would be able to steal loot from a turf without capping it. That idea would work perfectly in this situation.

It doesn't make sense, which is why all loot has a minimum level that you can equip it. I'm opposed to the stealing loot idea.