Optimal Defence > Optimal Attack

Forums › Suggestions & Feedback › Optimal Defence > Optimal Attack

MovingOn Jan 18, 2010

Why does the setup of an optimal defence largely outweigh the optimal attacking setup?

Opt. Def = 1 Minigun + 1 Body Armor
16 + 15 = 31 def

Opt. Attack = 1 RPG + Body Armor
22 + 2 = 24 attack

31 def vs 24 attack, there really is no competition. Meaning the attacking mobster would have to have a higher mob count in order to win.
MovingOn Jan 18, 2010

Sorry if this has been addressed already.
Tom Hagen Jan 18, 2010

It has, see my request for more, higher attack armor choices
Mr. Chris Jan 18, 2010

The defending party usually has an advantage in a lot of things.
mikeydw Jan 18, 2010

I think it should have the advantage. Makes sense defender has advantage.

Means new players have a slightly better chance of survival (which is good for all of us)
Tom Hagen Jan 18, 2010

I'm all for defense advantage, but the current 30% is too much imo
Neo_Direwolf Jan 19, 2010

I think that this takes into account that the "defender" would have intimate knowledge of their turf, strongholds etc, and be dug in & fortified !!! Whereas the attacker is usually out in the open !!!! At least that's how I percieve it !!!